Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George W. Bush, Boy President: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[George W. Bush, Boy President]]: - delete |
AmitDeshwar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Delete''' Not notable enough. [[User:Rhindle The Red|Rhindle The Red]] 20:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Not notable enough. [[User:Rhindle The Red|Rhindle The Red]] 20:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as non-notable now, although subsequent developments could change that. [[User:Badbilltucker|Badbilltucker]] 21:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as non-notable now, although subsequent developments could change that. [[User:Badbilltucker|Badbilltucker]] 21:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Agree with Irongargoyle. If verfifiable information showing a "substantial" listening audience (per PDXnut) can be shown, then keep. And by substantial I mean actually substantial. If the whole town listens to it, thats signifigant. [[User:AmitDeshwar|AmitDeshwar]] 01:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:08, 26 September 2006
WP:OR--Wdaoo 10:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —Jared Hunt September 25, 2006, 10:39 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (again) --Alex | talk / review me | 12:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete NN local program. Unless national syndication or substantial internet listenership can be proven, this is simply not noteworthy enough. Irongargoyle 15:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- KEEP -- How much traffic must be enjoyed before this program is deemed "Substantial" by Irongargoyle? And is this the only objection to the article's existing? Hopefully the fact it's a political satire isn't the underpinning argument against keeping it up, as the show enjoys a considerably substantial listenership. The reasoning behind "local programming" being nixed seems rather vague as well, considering the station the show airs on has it's own entry. If "local programming" is too small to warrant its own entry, then why would the station broadcasting such programming be worthy of an entry? It's too "local" to be noteworthy then. That seems to be the logic that's following. But if the station itself and the individual programs ARE worthy of a wikipedia entry, why wouldn't the shows themselves be, as it follows the shows would have the same audience as the people listening to the station. -- PDXnut 11:01 25 September 2006
- Delete per Irongargoyle. I don't think WP:OR is an issue here, but this is a minor bit on a local radio station. This level of minutae is simply not an appropriate use of Wikipedia.--Isotope23 19:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable enough. Rhindle The Red 20:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable now, although subsequent developments could change that. Badbilltucker 21:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with Irongargoyle. If verfifiable information showing a "substantial" listening audience (per PDXnut) can be shown, then keep. And by substantial I mean actually substantial. If the whole town listens to it, thats signifigant. AmitDeshwar 01:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)