Talk:Darksiders: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Contested deletion: new section |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This page should not be speedily deleted because... The previous consensus was made before the announcement of a third entry in the series on May 2, 2017. --[[Special:Contributions/47.18.195.47|47.18.195.47]] ([[User talk:47.18.195.47|talk]]) 16:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
This page should not be speedily deleted because... The previous consensus was made before the announcement of a third entry in the series on May 2, 2017. --[[Special:Contributions/47.18.195.47|47.18.195.47]] ([[User talk:47.18.195.47|talk]]) 16:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
: 1. The third game hasn't been released yet. 2. The arguments in that discussion are still completely valid, the announcement of a third game doesn't mean a series article automatically qualifies. --[[User:The1337gamer|The1337gamer]] ([[User talk:The1337gamer|talk]]) 16:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
: 1. The third game hasn't been released yet. 2. The arguments in that discussion are still completely valid, the announcement of a third game doesn't mean a series article automatically qualifies. --[[User:The1337gamer|The1337gamer]] ([[User talk:The1337gamer|talk]]) 16:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
:: If the argument you're referring to is a lack of content then the page should be allowed time to expand. I would wait at least a month before requesting deletion again, not a day after the page is made. [[Special:Contributions/47.18.195.47|47.18.195.47]] ([[User talk:47.18.195.47|talk]]) 16:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Contested deletion == |
== Contested deletion == |
Revision as of 16:56, 3 May 2017
This article was nominated for deletion on April 12 2017. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... The previous consensus was made before the announcement of a third entry in the series on May 2, 2017. --47.18.195.47 (talk) 16:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- 1. The third game hasn't been released yet. 2. The arguments in that discussion are still completely valid, the announcement of a third game doesn't mean a series article automatically qualifies. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- If the argument you're referring to is a lack of content then the page should be allowed time to expand. I would wait at least a month before requesting deletion again, not a day after the page is made. 47.18.195.47 (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted it reflects a legitimate franchise. --194.78.85.200 (talk) 16:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)