Talk:Autoimmunity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Technopete (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:Sligahan|Sligahan]] 16/09/2006 |
[[User:Sligahan|Sligahan]] 16/09/2006 |
||
---- |
---- |
||
Will add research into using enzyme potentiated desensitization (EPD) as a treatment for autoimmune disease. Others will hopefully know of other generic treatments that should go in this section. [[User:Technopete|Peter Davies]] 20:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:12, 29 September 2006
"... where LDN has been reported as beneficial include multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease, HIV/AIDS, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, AD in children (Elchaar GM, et al. 2006) " You call that a footnote? --GangofOne 06:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed, copied footnote from 'Naltrexone' article; someone else came up with it.--GangofOne 22:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the beginning of the second paragraph in the introduction is confusing: The illusory misconception that an individual's immune system is totally incapable of recognising "self" antigens is not new. I have removed illusory to make it clearer, I hope its ok to do this.
Also the first paragraph in the introduction sets out autoimmuntiy as: failure of an organism to recognise its own constituent parts, and autoimmune disease being an abherent immune response. But the second paragraph jumps to "natural autoimmunity". I find the way the intoduction reads a bit confusing (I do have a science background, but don't know much about immunology - I came to wikipedia to read about autoimmune disease) could the authors of this page tie the two paragraphs of introduction together? Sligahan 16/09/2006
Will add research into using enzyme potentiated desensitization (EPD) as a treatment for autoimmune disease. Others will hopefully know of other generic treatments that should go in this section. Peter Davies 20:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)