Talk:Sachsenspiegel: Difference between revisions
Explanation about translation issues etc. |
Currently preparing an article |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
There was a cleanup tag that got removed, although some of the translation was, er, somewhat misleading, so I have attempted to remedy the worst instances of mistranslation and generally revise the article, rather than just put the cleanup tag back. I hope that is in order. Perhaps someone more knowlegeable about German legal history will take a look. |
There was a cleanup tag that got removed, although some of the translation was, er, somewhat misleading, so I have attempted to remedy the worst instances of mistranslation and generally revise the article, rather than just put the cleanup tag back. I hope that is in order. Perhaps someone more knowlegeable about German legal history will take a look. |
||
--[[User:Boson|Boson]] 18:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC) |
--[[User:Boson|Boson]] 18:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Currently preparing an article == |
|||
The Sachsenspiegel is my speciality, I have studied the document for over 10 years now. I am currently editing part of my thesis on the document so that it is suitable for a completely new article on this; there is a lot of rubbish in this article. |
|||
Revision as of 15:11, 2 October 2006
Earlier versions of this article were apparently based on a translation of the German Wikipedia article (citation required by copyleft?). --Boson 18:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
There was a cleanup tag that got removed, although some of the translation was, er, somewhat misleading, so I have attempted to remedy the worst instances of mistranslation and generally revise the article, rather than just put the cleanup tag back. I hope that is in order. Perhaps someone more knowlegeable about German legal history will take a look. --Boson 18:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Currently preparing an article
The Sachsenspiegel is my speciality, I have studied the document for over 10 years now. I am currently editing part of my thesis on the document so that it is suitable for a completely new article on this; there is a lot of rubbish in this article.