Jump to content

User talk:68.234.100.139: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 4: Line 4:


If you had been cooperative and read the comments you removed, and heeded them, this would not have been necessary. But since it seems that you are unable or unwilling to communicate well, I have started a discussion [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Tendentious editing by IP|here]]. You are welcome to comment there, but please note that [[Wikipedia:COMMUNITY|Wikipedia is a community]] and that just because (almost) anyone can edit Wikipedia doesn't mean everyone's edits or opinions can be included.--[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 06:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
If you had been cooperative and read the comments you removed, and heeded them, this would not have been necessary. But since it seems that you are unable or unwilling to communicate well, I have started a discussion [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Tendentious editing by IP|here]]. You are welcome to comment there, but please note that [[Wikipedia:COMMUNITY|Wikipedia is a community]] and that just because (almost) anyone can edit Wikipedia doesn't mean everyone's edits or opinions can be included.--[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 06:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


::And apparently you are intolerant of any editing and editors who don't comply with your wishes and don't share your beliefs, ideas and theories. You are censoring me, I have no interest in validating or legitimizing your censorship by participating in a "discussion" where you an fellow intolerant Wikipedian censors will form a collective "community" firing squad and discuss me and my contributions and their worthiness or lack thereof for your "community" online encyclopedia. You're edit-warring and waited a significant period of time to return to revert my reversion and delete my content. Now you want to act civil, polite and community-minded and feign pleasantness while criticizing me on my talk page. Sorry, but you're not worth my time and your own "contribution" is nothing but intolerance, censorship and rude personal attacks you think you cleverly disguise as goal-oriented constructive behavior and "communication". Good luck with your discussion. Enjoy your community council of "superior" Wikipedians who can edit, delete and destroy actual contributions at will because they are "dedicated" to the cause of "building an encyclopedia".

Revision as of 11:01, 18 July 2017

=

Discussion at WP:ANI

If you had been cooperative and read the comments you removed, and heeded them, this would not have been necessary. But since it seems that you are unable or unwilling to communicate well, I have started a discussion here. You are welcome to comment there, but please note that Wikipedia is a community and that just because (almost) anyone can edit Wikipedia doesn't mean everyone's edits or opinions can be included.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


And apparently you are intolerant of any editing and editors who don't comply with your wishes and don't share your beliefs, ideas and theories. You are censoring me, I have no interest in validating or legitimizing your censorship by participating in a "discussion" where you an fellow intolerant Wikipedian censors will form a collective "community" firing squad and discuss me and my contributions and their worthiness or lack thereof for your "community" online encyclopedia. You're edit-warring and waited a significant period of time to return to revert my reversion and delete my content. Now you want to act civil, polite and community-minded and feign pleasantness while criticizing me on my talk page. Sorry, but you're not worth my time and your own "contribution" is nothing but intolerance, censorship and rude personal attacks you think you cleverly disguise as goal-oriented constructive behavior and "communication". Good luck with your discussion. Enjoy your community council of "superior" Wikipedians who can edit, delete and destroy actual contributions at will because they are "dedicated" to the cause of "building an encyclopedia".