Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate's Playground (second nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
comment |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
While the creator of the website might (just barely) be notable, this article is about the website, not its owner. As such, the notability standards in [[WP:WEB]] apply, and I do not believe they are met. -- [[User:Merope|Merope]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Merope|Talk]]</sup></small> 15:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC) |
While the creator of the website might (just barely) be notable, this article is about the website, not its owner. As such, the notability standards in [[WP:WEB]] apply, and I do not believe they are met. -- [[User:Merope|Merope]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Merope|Talk]]</sup></small> 15:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' – has a [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.katesplayground.com/ reasonable] traffic rank of 5,240, compared to [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.tiffanyteen.com other similar models] who have their own [[Tiffany Teen|extensive articles]] on Wikipedia. But, I '''abstain''' for now. — [[User:FireFox|<span style="color:blue">FireFox</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:green">'''~'''</span>]])</sup> <sub>15:28, 08 October 2006</sub> |
*'''Comment''' – has a [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.katesplayground.com/ reasonable] traffic rank of 5,240, compared to [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.tiffanyteen.com other similar models] who have their own [[Tiffany Teen|extensive articles]] on Wikipedia. But, I '''abstain''' for now. — [[User:FireFox|<span style="color:blue">FireFox</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:FireFox|<span style="color:green">'''~'''</span>]])</sup> <sub>15:28, 08 October 2006</sub> |
||
WTF. Merpoe you are just trolling me now. |
|||
http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=kate's+playground, this article is #4. Keep it. It is very handy. |
Revision as of 16:20, 8 October 2006
Kate's Playground
While the creator of the website might (just barely) be notable, this article is about the website, not its owner. As such, the notability standards in WP:WEB apply, and I do not believe they are met. -- Merope Talk 15:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment – has a reasonable traffic rank of 5,240, compared to other similar models who have their own extensive articles on Wikipedia. But, I abstain for now. — FireFox (~) 15:28, 08 October 2006
WTF. Merpoe you are just trolling me now. http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=kate's+playground, this article is #4. Keep it. It is very handy.