Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Katie: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:51, 9 October 2006

Planet Katie

I previously speedied this article as it did not assert notability (per WP:CSD#A7). The article as it stands now does not meet WP:WEB or WP:BIO. -- Merope ^Talk 15:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Leuko 15:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hello32020 15:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete because although you are all admins and high up this is a good article Deadbath 18:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

contribs) .

- Actually, it's a bad article. There's nothing in the article that shows that the web site satisfies the WP:WEB criteria, with all of the cited sources being the web site itself. Wikipedia is not a World Wide Web directory. Uncle G 16:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Valrith 23:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - no indication that this meets WP:WEB. GassyGuy 02:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete per nom -16:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)~~

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Valrith|Valrith]] 23:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per nom - no indication that this meets [[WP:WEB]]. [[User:GassyGuy|GassyGuy]] 02:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Not Delete''' per nom -16:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)~~