Talk:Jap: Difference between revisions
Wavetwista (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Use of Jap by British teachers== |
|||
Removed the part about use of Jap in english classrooms. I live in England and it's a definate taboo. It's on par with saying something like "paki" - --[[User:Wavetwista|Wavetwista]] 22:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Quit arguing in the damn page. There is no citations or proof of Japanese people calling each other "Jap" in Japan. - GZAdmin |
Quit arguing in the damn page. There is no citations or proof of Japanese people calling each other "Jap" in Japan. - GZAdmin |
||
Revision as of 22:42, 9 October 2006
Use of Jap by British teachers
Removed the part about use of Jap in english classrooms. I live in England and it's a definate taboo. It's on par with saying something like "paki" - --Wavetwista 22:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Quit arguing in the damn page. There is no citations or proof of Japanese people calling each other "Jap" in Japan. - GZAdmin
This site is full of racial discrimination against us Japanese. Delete it as soon as possible!
Additional subject
Thanks Tokek! Good extra link that is informative. JungleCat 13:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Jap in Japan
Out of interest, is "Jap" considered a racial slur in Japan? Thanks. PizzaMargherita 05:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
From the article: "In Japanese dictionaries, the term "Jap" is only defined as a disparaging term used against the Japanese people, like it is the case in many English language dictionaries." The answer would be yes (it's mainly considered as an English word).—Tokek 17:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Ah, sorry, I stopped at the introduction. I have promoted that sentence to the intro and done some cleanup, I hope it's ok. A link to another Japanese online dictionary for "Jap" would be nice. Thanks! PizzaMargherita 17:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I have added a link to an online dictionary provided by Yahoo! Japan, which is definitely a more recognisable brand in the English speaking part of the world than Goo. If you have specific ideas about finding more sources yourself, I might be able to assist you, however right now I don't see the need for too many references because dictionary definitions tend to be easily verifiable and available. —Tokek 05:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
No, I think two is adequate, thanks very much! PizzaMargherita 08:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)