Talk:Idu (novel): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Aadam Bandaisha |
Aadam Bandaisha |
||
== Response to Peer Review == |
|||
Thank you all for the feedback on the article, I will take the feedback provided and work it into further drafts of the article after the publication process by Wikipedia. The feedback on the headings and subheadings used was particularly helpful in improving future organization to the article. |
|||
Alex Peters |
|||
Revision as of 20:32, 23 October 2017
Peer Review
Hi,
I really like the overall work your group has produced. I like how you have lots of references to back up your information and it is properly cited. I would like to see more info about each of the characters in the novel, it would be interesting to know more about how each of the characters have their roles in the novel. Great work! -Suzanne Bullock Suzannebullock (talk) 01:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there!
Great article so far. I'm really impressed with your layout and use of links and headings. I notice your photo has been removed.. which is unfortunate - but I like the section to the right of your screen where the quick view of the author and date of publication can be viewed. I might suggest adding a more detailed summary of the book, or if it is a long novel, doing summaries of each chapter/section of the book. This way wiki viewers get a better idea of what your book is about. Other than the I'm really impressed. Great job! Stillber (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Savanah
grammar issues
Hello,
Overall the article looks great with the separation of the sections and the content is really accessible. However, there are a few grammatical issues in the plot section and a couple that follow. Your article has great connections to links and references as well. -Taylor (Phoenix47.tm (talk) 19:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC))
Peer Review
Very good article so far!
I would recommend that you make make the major characters, and culture subheadings out from the plot heading and make them their own heading. This is because they do not directly relate to the plot but are still very important to the understanding of the article. excellent use of links and numbers citations. Well thought out However the character section could use more information as there is very little information about even important characters
All the best I hope you all get a good mark!
Aadam Bandaisha
Response to Peer Review
Thank you all for the feedback on the article, I will take the feedback provided and work it into further drafts of the article after the publication process by Wikipedia. The feedback on the headings and subheadings used was particularly helpful in improving future organization to the article.
Alex Peters