Jump to content

Talk:Riverine rabbit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


== Two Notes for Editors ==
Julia,

I thoroughly enjoyed reading the new updates to this article. I think there are a few things that would make it even better. If at all possible, a picture added to the article would help the reader imagine what this particular rabbit looks like. Also, the reader could have benefitted from knowing the rabbit's life span or time taken to mature. Just a few suggestions, it was overall very well put together.
To any Wikipedia editors concerned with this article,

In the reference section, there are 2 entries, 7 and 19, that seem to have faulty links, because of the red characters in the reference section. However, if one finds the links connected to the in text citations for these two numbers, they function just fine. So I am not really sure how to fix this, because the links in reality work and take one to a valid website, if one finds where they are referenced in the article.

In addition, the new information in this article has been used to contribute to the fauna section on the Karoo desert wikipedia page, so editors do not need to worry about that.

Thank you,

colinjegan


-Lauren Leiden[[User:Lwleiden|Lwleiden]] ([[User talk:Lwleiden|talk]]) 03:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


== Large Scale Edit/Expansion ==
== Large Scale Edit/Expansion ==
Line 15: Line 23:
user:colinjegan
user:colinjegan


== Two Notes for Editors ==


To any Wikipedia editors concerned with this article,


Julia,
In the reference section, there are 2 entries, 7 and 19, that seem to have faulty links, because of the red characters in the reference section. However, if one finds the links connected to the in text citations for these two numbers, they function just fine. So I am not really sure how to fix this, because the links in reality work and take one to a valid website, if one finds where they are referenced in the article.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading the new updates to this article. I think there are a few things that would make it even better. If at all possible, a picture added to the article would help the reader imagine what this particular rabbit looks like. Also, the reader could have benefitted from knowing the rabbit's life span or time taken to mature. Just a few suggestions, it was overall very well put together.

In addition, the new information in this article has been used to contribute to the fauna section on the Karoo desert wikipedia page, so editors do not need to worry about that.


-Lauren Leiden[[User:Lwleiden|Lwleiden]] ([[User talk:Lwleiden|talk]]) 03:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you,

colinjegan

Revision as of 02:08, 17 November 2017

Two Notes for Editors

To any Wikipedia editors concerned with this article,

In the reference section, there are 2 entries, 7 and 19, that seem to have faulty links, because of the red characters in the reference section. However, if one finds the links connected to the in text citations for these two numbers, they function just fine. So I am not really sure how to fix this, because the links in reality work and take one to a valid website, if one finds where they are referenced in the article.

In addition, the new information in this article has been used to contribute to the fauna section on the Karoo desert wikipedia page, so editors do not need to worry about that.

Thank you,

colinjegan


Large Scale Edit/Expansion

Dear Wikipedia Editors,

As part of an assignment for our writing class, our team undertook a large scale edit/expansion of this article. We added 14 sources. We expanded the lead and these sections: identification, lead, behavior, and reproduction. We created these sections: taxonomy, predators and behaviors, diet, reproduction, relationship with humans, endangerment, and conservation. We also cleaned up the talk page.

Thank you

user:colinjegan


Julia, I thoroughly enjoyed reading the new updates to this article. I think there are a few things that would make it even better. If at all possible, a picture added to the article would help the reader imagine what this particular rabbit looks like. Also, the reader could have benefitted from knowing the rabbit's life span or time taken to mature. Just a few suggestions, it was overall very well put together.

-Lauren LeidenLwleiden (talk) 03:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]