Talk:Attitude (psychology): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:18, 13 October 2006

in fact every thing written about attitudes but, their is no information (so far to me)that has not been published about the history of emerging of attitude and hoe really came about.

any response please send it to: zaneen1@yahoo.com

The wiki article pegs my bull-crapto-meter. It should win an award for most uninformative psycho-babble.

Headline text

Reference to 2006 paper in Annual Review of Psychology

I think it would be advised if this article could make use of an article that appeared in the Annual Review of Psychology for 2006 on attitudes. I shall give the full reference when I have found it. ACEO 18:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC) The reference is: Crano, W.D. & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and Persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345-374ACEO 18:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:32, 4 October 2006 edit Shaikphakeer (talk \| contribs) 4 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:18, 13 October 2006 edit undo 196.42.61.61 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	in fact every thing ~~been~~ written about attitudes but, no information (so far to me)not been published about the history of emerging of attitude and hoe ~~realy~~ came about.		in fact every thing written about attitudes but, their is no information (so far to me)that has not been published about the history of emerging of attitude and hoe really came about.

	any response please send it to: zaneen1@yahoo.com		any response please send it to: zaneen1@yahoo.com