User:Quinto Simmaco/PROD Logs: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Logging PROD nomination of The Mark on Brickell. (TW) |
Logging PROD nomination of Atlanta Masjid of Al-Islam. (TW) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
# [[:The Mark on Brickell]]: PROD; notified {{user|Raime}} 22:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
# [[:The Mark on Brickell]]: PROD; notified {{user|Raime}} 22:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
||
#* '''Reason''': Non-notable building. Good faith search (Google main, Google News, Google Books, etc) turned up only passing mentions related to people, and nothing about the subject building itself. Simply being a skyscraper doesn't confer notability. |
#* '''Reason''': Non-notable building. Good faith search (Google main, Google News, Google Books, etc) turned up only passing mentions related to people, and nothing about the subject building itself. Simply being a skyscraper doesn't confer notability. |
||
=== December 2017 === |
|||
# [[:Atlanta Masjid of Al-Islam]]: PROD; notified {{user|BigCoolGuyy}} 04:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
#* '''Reason''': Non-notable building and associated local religious community, neither of which meet any of the relevant notability guidelines. |
|||
Despite being presented as separate references with different dates the three citations are all the same source (in fact, the same exact web page); all redirect to one page. The Pluralism Project, aside from being the sole source, is not an indicator of notability. |
|||
The HPP is essentially a directory/listing of various religious communities. No apparent criteria for inclusion/listing except submission, and verifiability of its organisation's existence. It may also be relying on self published material in this case, given the paucity of secondary sourcing. None of this is enough to demonstrate notability. |
|||
A good faith search (Google News, Books) turned up no independent or secondary sources. |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:17, 1 December 2017
This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.
If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.
March 2016
[edit]- Kashmir Observer: PROD; notified Fazal.haider (talk · contribs) 09:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not appear to satisfy the requirements of the Wikipedia:Notability_(periodicals) guidelines, and might fail GNG. One of the references is simply a link to the frontpage, and the other is a SELFPUB press release. Seems to be a case of soft PROMO, especially as some of the primary editors appear to be COI socks.
April 2016
[edit]- Should I Remove It?: PROD; notified NinjaRobotPirate (talk · contribs) 00:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Reason: Unsourced, and insignificant. The references are actually the standard reviews given by staff for any new software that is uploaded; every single one is essentially just a download link. None of these references are articles, or anything of anything close to RS. Meets all the criteria for PRODing.
June 2016
[edit]- Latin Rite Catholic Church (splinter group): PROD; notified Johnpacklambert (talk · contribs) 06:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable religious group/organisation. No citations... Did a good faith search, and no RS could be found to establish notability, including even passing mentions.
November 2017
[edit]- Love, Heartache and Other Stories: PROD; notified Rompiendoesquemas (talk · contribs) 08:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Reason: Vanity article on an author's self-published poetry; unreferenced. Doesn't meet notability guidelines. OCLC WorldCat link isn't even to his book.
- The Mark on Brickell: PROD; notified Raime (talk · contribs) 22:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable building. Good faith search (Google main, Google News, Google Books, etc) turned up only passing mentions related to people, and nothing about the subject building itself. Simply being a skyscraper doesn't confer notability.
December 2017
[edit]- Atlanta Masjid of Al-Islam: PROD; notified BigCoolGuyy (talk · contribs) 04:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable building and associated local religious community, neither of which meet any of the relevant notability guidelines.
Despite being presented as separate references with different dates the three citations are all the same source (in fact, the same exact web page); all redirect to one page. The Pluralism Project, aside from being the sole source, is not an indicator of notability. The HPP is essentially a directory/listing of various religious communities. No apparent criteria for inclusion/listing except submission, and verifiability of its organisation's existence. It may also be relying on self published material in this case, given the paucity of secondary sourcing. None of this is enough to demonstrate notability. A good faith search (Google News, Books) turned up no independent or secondary sources.