Talk:Pico (text editor): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:54, 9 March 2018

Computing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Comment from October 2001

Why not put some good/unique features of it on this page (ie. why do people use it)? Its just I never understood why people would use something not so far advanced from notepad to wirte with... Although I just realised that I'm writing in a textbox inside Explorer :-) --Na

A history section could easily explain why Pico was used --Candide124 (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

Is it PEA-ko or PIE-ko? It was made in Washington, so it uses standard american english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:405:4202:C7F0:858D:C3A5:B37:C4B8 (talk) 17:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed

The claim that GNU Nano does not support the Home and End keys has not been true for a very long time. I use Nano on an almost daily basis, and the Home and End keys (along with the arrow keys) most definitely do work. Matt Whitlock (talk) 19:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Well, it might count as original research, but a quick check reveals that that my Home and End keys certainly work in nano! (Really, this is such a trivial fact, I'm not sure how if could be verified without it being OR.) Milsgnome (talk) 22:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Here's a closed bug report that reports the issue as resolved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=122815. I posted the wrong bug report in my edit comment; this one is the correct. Milsgnome (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vi and Emacs

Mentioning vi and emacs is irrelevant to the article, It seems to me to be a plug for vi and emacs. It's possible to mention features pico doesn't exhibit without plugging other software. 82.38.204.141 (talk) 22:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alpine release

The Pine release has been suspended and now the Alpine version has taken over. Should an additional infobox be added to show the new release? Alpine is a rewrite of Pine by UW and it resets the version number cycle for itself, but alpine-2.00/pico/mswinver.c seems to give a version number of 5.4. -- Arthur 2e5 Crap 17:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The lede is incredibly biased...

It's straight up advertising for other editors, AND the nonsense about the GPL being "free". Last I checked, communism wasn't freedom, but slavery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:405:4202:C7F0:858D:C3A5:B37:C4B8 (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Comment from October 2001==
 Why not put some good/unique features of it on this page (ie. why do people use it)? Its just I never understood why people would use something not so far advanced from notepad to wirte with... Although I just realised that I'm writing in a textbox inside Explorer :-) --Na
+:A history section could easily explain why Pico was used --[[User:Candide124|Candide124]] ([[User talk:Candide124|talk]]) 08:53, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 == Pronunciation ==