Jump to content

Troxel v. Granville: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pan Dan (talk | contribs)
wording
the plaintiffs in this case were grandparents
Line 22: Line 22:
|LawsApplied=
|LawsApplied=
}}
}}
'''''Troxel v. Granville''''', [[Case citation|530 U.S. 57]] ([[2000]])<ref>[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=530&page=57 530 U.S. 57] Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.</ref>, was a case in which the [[Supreme Court of the United States]], citing a constitutional right of parents to rear their children, struck down a Washington state law that allowed anyone to petition state courts for child visitation rights over parental objections.
'''''Troxel v. Granville''''', [[Case citation|530 U.S. 57]] ([[2000]])<ref>[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=530&page=57 530 U.S. 57] Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.</ref>, was a case in which the [[Supreme Court of the United States]], citing a constitutional right of parents to rear their children, struck down a Washington state law that allowed grandparents to petition state courts for child visitation rights over parental objections.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 12:55, 24 October 2006

Troxel v. Granville
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Full case nameTroxel et vir. v. Granville
Citations530 U.S. 57 (more)
Holding
A law that allows anyone to petition a court for child visitation rights over parental objections unconstitutionally infringes on parents' fundamental right to rear their children.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
PluralityO'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Ginsburg, Breyer
ConcurrenceSouter
ConcurrenceThomas
DissentStevens
DissentScalia
DissentKennedy

Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States, citing a constitutional right of parents to rear their children, struck down a Washington state law that allowed grandparents to petition state courts for child visitation rights over parental objections.

References

  1. ^ 530 U.S. 57 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.