User talk:Urmichatterjee/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:37, 9 April 2018

Peer Review by Cecilia

Absolutely fantastic work on the description of the movie! You have citations, links, and a great writing style! I think the link under "train to Pakistan" might not be relevant, though, as it leads to the Wikipedia page for it and doesn't really have anything to do with the film, I'm assuming?

I would also encourage you to look over the "Collaboration with Bapsi Sidhwa" paragraph again to make sure it's not too opinionated/lacks citations.

Further, add something by Mehta about this film too! I think it would be interesting to hear what she has to say about this quite fascinating work of hers. Good job overall! Cbschramm (talk) 21:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review - Hans

I think you have a lot of really good stuff here. The one thing I'm mostly concerned with is how deep you go into synopsis for the Elements trilogy. Maybe this would do better on the film's page, while focusing on the general themes and/or relation to the filmmaker here? If you can find BTS info that'd be great.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Further, add something by Mehta about this film too! I think it would be interesting to hear what she has to say about this quite fascinating work of hers. Good job overall! [[User:Cbschramm|Cbschramm]] ([[User talk:Cbschramm|talk]]) 21:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
+== Peer Review - Hans ==
+I think you have a lot of really good stuff here. The one thing I'm mostly concerned with is how deep you go into synopsis for the Elements trilogy. Maybe this would do better on the film's page, while focusing on the general themes and/or relation to the filmmaker here? If you can find BTS info that'd be great.