User talk:Harej

User:Messedrocker/Header Welcome to my talk page!

• Please add all messages under its own header on the bottom.
• If you need an urgent response, email me.
  • You should also take a look at my MessedRocker On-The-Fly box on my user page
• If you leave a message here, I will respond on your user page. I expect you likewise to make your follow-up response (if applicable) on my page, and so forth.

Conversations are automatically archived the week after the latest comment on my talk page.

• User talk:Messedrocker/Archive01: November 26, 2004 - August 31, 2006
• User talk:Messedrocker/Archive02: September 1, 2006

Signpost updated for October 16th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 42	16 October 2006	About the Signpost

Wikipedia partially unblocked in mainland China	$100 million copyright fund stems discussion
Floyd Landis adopts "the Wikipedia defense" as appeal strategy	News and notes: Logo votes begin, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

NicVax etc.

Hey, thanks for the message. I had never heard of NicVax, but I read the article and it's really fascinating. The cigarette companies must hate it! I can work on putting the refs into journal style. Too bad the template is so bulky; it makes it hard to edit the article. Ah well. Anyway, good "meeting" you ... drop me a line whenever you want. Peace, delldot | talk 15:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

article referencing drive

i love the idea behind the article referencing drive...but did you give up on it? JoeSmack ^Talk(p-review!) 17:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 23rd.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 43	23 October 2006	About the Signpost

Report from the Finnish Wikipedia	News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello Messedrocker,

Hello,

I am the anon who has been working on the soybean article, biological value, and other articles. I was going to add more info to the articles including soy protein but you blocked it. If you approve of my edits in the soybean article then why did you block the other articles. I want you to block all the article or unblock all the articles. Not blocking the soy article and blocking the arrticles is contradicting yourself. Why? Because I am the one you and others sre calling a sock. You you don't like a sock then why the heck you did not block the soybean article too.

Go block the soybean article too to make it official buddy.

I can open as many accounts as I please. There is no policy against having 1 million accounts.

In facts it is none of anyone's business.

You can block all you want buddy. I consider your blocks a personal attack.

I am not being disruptive buddy. Please block the soybean article now.

Yankee76 has been policeing me and wikistalking me and HE has broke the 3 revert rule and then you have the oddessity to accuse me of being disruptive and then say my anon edits to the soybean article meets with your delight and approval.

You are a joke!

I demand you block the soybean article right now because now I am REALLY MAD.

After all my hours of hard work you call me disruptive. Forget YOU. 63.17.54.97 15:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Streisand Estate

Well done, thanks for http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Streisand_Estate.JPG&diff=68968076&oldid=68724759 ... --Rebroad 18:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Request for Full Protection to prevent ongoing edit war

Please fully protect all articles in question.

Soy, biological value, soy protein...etc. This is a full scale EDIT WAR.

Yankees76 has made numerous reverts to some of the articles in question.

If you take a close look at the history Yankees76 he has BROKE the 3 revet rule.

Again, this is REVERT WARRING that show absolutely no sign of stopping.

I think the only solution for now is LOCK UP ALL THE ARTICLES RIGHT NOW!!!

If you don't the WAR will continue.

Just fully protect the article for only a week. Just one week for things to cool off!!!

Please don't let this CRAZYNESS WARRING continue.

Again, block everyone from editting until things cool off.

I am ready for anything either way.

If Yankees76 reverts my edits I will junp right in again and again and again.

Thnaks for your help. Messenger2010 19:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)