Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rewired: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rewired|Rewired]]=== |
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rewired|Rewired]]=== |
||
'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rewired|action=edit}} Voice your opinion]''' |
'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rewired|action=edit}} Voice your opinion]''' |
||
'''(0/ |
'''(0/3/0) Ending 17:53, [[5 November]] [[2006]] (UTC)''' |
||
{{User|Rewired}} – Over 2000 edits. [[User:Rewired|Rewired]] 17:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
{{User|Rewired}} – Over 2000 edits. [[User:Rewired|Rewired]] 17:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
#'''STRONG OPPOSE''' - User has 9 edits and answers to questions seem like jokes. --[[User:Db099221|Db099221]] 17:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
#'''STRONG OPPOSE''' - User has 9 edits and answers to questions seem like jokes. --[[User:Db099221|Db099221]] 17:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
#'''Oppose''' and urge immediate delisting due to the facetious answer to question three. [[User:Fys|Fys]]. “[[User:Fys|Ta]] [[Special:Contributions/Fys|fys]] [[User talk:Fys|aym]]”. 18:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
#'''Oppose''' and urge immediate delisting due to the facetious answer to question three. [[User:Fys|Fys]]. “[[User:Fys|Ta]] [[Special:Contributions/Fys|fys]] [[User talk:Fys|aym]]”. 18:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
:I didn't want to argue with any of the possible oppose votes but there is no sarcasm in what I said [[User:Rewired|Rewired]] 18:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
'''Neutral''' |
'''Neutral''' |
||
Revision as of 18:10, 29 October 2006
Voice your opinion (0/3/0) Ending 17:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Rewired (talk · contribs) – Over 2000 edits. Rewired 17:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
you bet
- Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A: banning the most obvious vandals
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A: no because nobody told me what to edit so everything i did was worthless
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: just aspergers but everyone has it here
- General comments
Discussion
Support
Oppose
- Oppose no real reasons given. --Alex (Talk) 17:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- STRONG OPPOSE - User has 9 edits and answers to questions seem like jokes. --Db099221 17:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose and urge immediate delisting due to the facetious answer to question three. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 18:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't want to argue with any of the possible oppose votes but there is no sarcasm in what I said Rewired 18:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Neutral