User talk:Michael Bednarek: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→July 2018: re: File:Jiaxin Cheng and Julian Lloyd Webber.jpg – response. |
Making accusations of payment constiture libel. The same applies to you {{Signed __Nescu23__}} |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Julian Lloyd Webber here. Your photo was taken at an event where photography was expressly forbidden. Please take it down! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vstrad7|Vstrad7]] ([[User talk:Vstrad7#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vstrad7|contribs]]) 15:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Julian Lloyd Webber here. Your photo was taken at an event where photography was expressly forbidden. Please take it down! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vstrad7|Vstrad7]] ([[User talk:Vstrad7#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vstrad7|contribs]]) 15:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I assume you mean the image [[:File:Jiaxin Cheng and Julian Lloyd Webber.jpg]] in article [[Julian Lloyd Webber]] where you are starting an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. As I wrote at [[c:User talk:Michael Bednarek#Photo of Jiaxin Cheng and Julian Lloyd Webber]], I recommend you read [[c:Commons:Deletion requests]]. You may also have noticed that your edit at that file's description has been reverted by [[User:LX]] with the edit summary, "There are [[c:Commons:Deletion requests#Starting requests|proper ways]] to request deletion. Vandalising file descriptions isn't it. Also: see [[c:Commons:Non-copyright restrictions#"House rules"]]. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek#top|talk]]) 00:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
:I assume you mean the image [[:File:Jiaxin Cheng and Julian Lloyd Webber.jpg]] in article [[Julian Lloyd Webber]] where you are starting an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. As I wrote at [[c:User talk:Michael Bednarek#Photo of Jiaxin Cheng and Julian Lloyd Webber]], I recommend you read [[c:Commons:Deletion requests]]. You may also have noticed that your edit at that file's description has been reverted by [[User:LX]] with the edit summary, "There are [[c:Commons:Deletion requests#Starting requests|proper ways]] to request deletion. Vandalising file descriptions isn't it. Also: see [[c:Commons:Non-copyright restrictions#"House rules"]]. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek#top|talk]]) 00:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
||
==June 2018 == |
|||
Re: Angelique Rockas |
|||
Posted On Dear Doc James you cannot hurl accusations of a paid editors for Angelique Rockas when there is no need for proving what was produced. If you are way on holiday have you read the material? |
|||
Making accusations of payment constiture libel. |
|||
The same applies to you |
|||
{{Signed __Nescu23__}} |
|||
Revision as of 10:31, 21 June 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
June 2018
Julian Lloyd Webber here. Your photo was taken at an event where photography was expressly forbidden. Please take it down! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vstrad7 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- I assume you mean the image File:Jiaxin Cheng and Julian Lloyd Webber.jpg in article Julian Lloyd Webber where you are starting an edit war. As I wrote at c:User talk:Michael Bednarek#Photo of Jiaxin Cheng and Julian Lloyd Webber, I recommend you read c:Commons:Deletion requests. You may also have noticed that your edit at that file's description has been reverted by User:LX with the edit summary, "There are proper ways to request deletion. Vandalising file descriptions isn't it. Also: see c:Commons:Non-copyright restrictions#"House rules". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
Re: Angelique Rockas Posted On Dear Doc James you cannot hurl accusations of a paid editors for Angelique Rockas when there is no need for proving what was produced. If you are way on holiday have you read the material? Making accusations of payment constiture libel. The same applies to you Template:Signed Nescu23