User talk:Nightwalker-87

New tables for LTE networks

Nightwalker-87, I am not very versed on editing tables, but the new table format is horrible. If I want to know what LTE bands are in use in a certain country, I have to scroll 100 positions down to the country, but the actual bands are on the top of the header, another 100 positions up. The old style had the bans right there next to the each operator/country. Can you make the header floating, so the list of operators will scroll "inside"? I know that is supposedly discouraged due to some mobile renders issues, but I am sure that this format is un-usefull on those mobile also. I would try to make that change, per this link but I might mess things up, by using trial and error.

The new table format was introduced for List of LTE networks in Europe as the used bands are harmonised across the Europe (CEPT). Therefore this format reduces article size significantly due to the more compact layout. Anyway I'll look what I can do about the scrolling issue as soon as I find some time. Maybe it is possible to lock the header on top while scrolling while maintaning the new layout. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

I tried my very best... Please refer to List of LTE networks in Europe again to verify. I am looking forward to your feedback. Thx. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 19:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! It's much, much useful this way! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoNic67 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Back again to the table format. Because of the small width of the symbol for sorting added inside some of the table columns, now the header fields are miss-aligned with the scrolling table below. I have tried to change the width of the header, but... it didn't work for me. Can you take a look at this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoNic67 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thx for the note. Indeed I've tried that before as well, as it is not very nice to look at currently. I haven't found a satisfying solution yet, but will address the issue as soon as possible. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 23:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Can you add the 4x4 MIMO, 256 QAM for Verizon Wireless in USA? Thanks, I don't want to mess up the tables :) https://finance.yahoo.com/news/verizon-continues-industry-leading-lte-161305950.html?.tsrc=rss https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/verizon-touts-lte-advanced-deployments-other-milestones — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoNic67 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

List of 5G...

Please do not make a list containing only one item--it is very likely to be nominated for deltion. If there are more to add, add them as soon as you can. DGG ( talk ) 18:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, will do - thx for the note. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

HSPA+

Why did you remove Botswana's networks from the list cause they'd have HSPA+ Gontle Galefite (talk) 11:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC) Gontle Galefite (talk) 11:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. As stated in the edit description this was a maintennance edit as it appeared to stand against WP:VER. To maintain or raise the quality for wiki content it needs to be verifiable from official sources (please also see WP:SPS in this context). In general it is not the task of other editors to do research for verifiable sources for edits by secondary users which can turn out to be very time consuming. So ideally it would be like: Somebody wants to update content with new info, as he is sure that it is correct info, he does some research to find verifiable sources and then adds the new info together with the found citations. Hope this advice helps you along. With this in mind and by looking at your user talkpage history (which I believe is: https://wikivividly.com/wiki/User_talk:Gontle_Galefite), you will hardly experience that any your edits will be rolled back - no matter which article or list you are editing. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have any further questions. I'm also here to assist. ;-) Nightwalker-87 (talk) 12:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

LMT

Cited sources for LMT included also information about operating cell towers. Also information is verified by me using Cellmapper.

Hi there. :-) Please note that information does not need to be verifiable by the editor himself but also for every reader or other editor. You can find additional information on that at WP:VER and WP:CS if you are unsure regarding your edit. Cellmapper alone is not a reliable source (WP:RS), as it turned out in previous discussions.
It would be great though if you can find additional sources, articles either from the operator itself or newspapers or technews pages on that content. I propose to open a topic on the article Talk page to find a way to get missing content in that can be verified from official side. Should you need any help with editing, please let me know. ;-) Nightwalker-87 (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

How to move

Articles are moved or renamed using the article move command, which may be under the more menu depending on your preferences and theme. Pasting the content of an article into one of its redirects (cut-and-paste move) loses attribution (the article history) so should not be done. Unfortunately, when the redirect has existing history, this mechanism cannot be used by most people, so there is a requested moves page. Uncontroversial moves will be made quickly, but might get reverted or even rejected if the admin feels it is debatable. Moves likely to be contested need to be discussed first. Lithopsian (talk) 10:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)