Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Media, the arts, and architecture: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
rm RfCs older than 1 month |
Midnight Syndicate was listed twice, so I deleted one. |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[[Talk:Cally Tyrol#Cally's first/last name]] - a debate over the naming of an article about a fictional (TV) character. At the core of the debate is the fact that the character's name has changed as a result of plot developments during the run of the series. The debate doesn't seem to be getting any closer to a resolution. -- 14:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
*[[Talk:Cally Tyrol#Cally's first/last name]] - a debate over the naming of an article about a fictional (TV) character. At the core of the debate is the fact that the character's name has changed as a result of plot developments during the run of the series. The debate doesn't seem to be getting any closer to a resolution. -- 14:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
*[[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#RfC Episode Article Naming conventions]] - a debate over the use of disambiguation titles for episode articles of a TV show when no disambiguation is needed. Also, when disambig titles are used for episode articles should they be (ShowName) or (ShowName episode). -- 02:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
*[[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#RfC Episode Article Naming conventions]] - a debate over the use of disambiguation titles for episode articles of a TV show when no disambiguation is needed. Also, when disambig titles are used for episode articles should they be (ShowName) or (ShowName episode). -- 02:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
*[[Talk:Midnight_Syndicate#Disputing_NPOV_.28New_Issue_OCT_2006.29]] Dispute about NPOV vs. original research and self-promotion. Fact vs. fiction. Deceptive editing being used as a promotional campaign to change actual history vs. documentation of printed material, legal docs, letters, earlier interviews and audio that show a different history, albeit undesirable to current band members. 07:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*[[Talk:Wizard (fantasy)#Request for comment]] This is a dispute about whether the terminology section should contain discussion of other terms, such as enchantress, sorcerer, or warlock, that are used in fantasy to refer to characters who practice magic. 00:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
*[[Talk:Wizard (fantasy)#Request for comment]] This is a dispute about whether the terminology section should contain discussion of other terms, such as enchantress, sorcerer, or warlock, that are used in fantasy to refer to characters who practice magic. 00:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
*[[Talk:The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past/Four Swords]] I didn't know where else to put this, so... there is a debate as to whether or not [[The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords]] should be merged into the above mentioned article, on the grounds that the latter game does not exist outside of the cartridge of the former game's and because not merging them means we'll have two small articles as opposed to one right-sized article. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] [[User talk:A Link to the Past|(talk)]] 05:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
*[[Talk:The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past/Four Swords]] I didn't know where else to put this, so... there is a debate as to whether or not [[The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords]] should be merged into the above mentioned article, on the grounds that the latter game does not exist outside of the cartridge of the former game's and because not merging them means we'll have two small articles as opposed to one right-sized article. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] [[User talk:A Link to the Past|(talk)]] 05:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 20:21, 5 November 2006
- Talk:Saint Seiya editors involved disagree as to the source of a certain character's evil spirit. Note that I am not personally involved in the dispute, and in fact know next to nothing about anime/manga; I'm just an advocate helping out one of the disputants who is unfamiliar with our conflict-resolution process. Kurt Weber 16:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Resident Evil 4#On graphics Edit dispute. I believe material is original research (and gibberish, but that's besides the point) and justify on Talk page: user insists on reverting it back in. I've removed it once, another user removed it again, and I've now removed it a second time. Needs additional user comment to reach a concensus or it's just going to turn into a revert war. Detail should be obvious from recent Page History and Talk page. Sockatume 01:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Midnight Syndicate - editors disagree about which of two versions is a better representation of the band and its history. 03:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Cally Tyrol#Cally's first/last name - a debate over the naming of an article about a fictional (TV) character. At the core of the debate is the fact that the character's name has changed as a result of plot developments during the run of the series. The debate doesn't seem to be getting any closer to a resolution. -- 14:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#RfC Episode Article Naming conventions - a debate over the use of disambiguation titles for episode articles of a TV show when no disambiguation is needed. Also, when disambig titles are used for episode articles should they be (ShowName) or (ShowName episode). -- 02:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Wizard (fantasy)#Request for comment This is a dispute about whether the terminology section should contain discussion of other terms, such as enchantress, sorcerer, or warlock, that are used in fantasy to refer to characters who practice magic. 00:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past/Four Swords I didn't know where else to put this, so... there is a debate as to whether or not The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords should be merged into the above mentioned article, on the grounds that the latter game does not exist outside of the cartridge of the former game's and because not merging them means we'll have two small articles as opposed to one right-sized article. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Flavor_Flav#Request_for_Comment:_List Inclusion of a Counter-Strike clan by one editor. 23:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Panic! at the Disco#Genre_debate Genre is being heavly disputed by AnonIP and registered users. Core of debate is clarity needed in who can determin a genre: 1.) Vote by wikipedian's or 2.) band/main stream media 09:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Very_special_episode#Request_for_Comment:_List. This is a request for comment on the extensive list of examples that is currently being disputed.05:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Paparazzo#Plural entry. As the moving editor and the objecting editor are the only ones discussing this (quite civil, but limited in scope), some additional eyes, thoughts and comments would be appreciated. 04:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)