Talk:Vandelay Industries: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→[[Vandelay Industries]]: redirect works for me |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Make separate article to encourage expansion. Notable topic within the context of the series. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 06:11, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
*Make separate article to encourage expansion. Notable topic within the context of the series. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 06:11, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge and Redirect''': [[User:DCEdwards1966|DCEdwards1966]] 06:57, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC) |
*'''Merge and Redirect''': [[User:DCEdwards1966|DCEdwards1966]] 06:57, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Yeah, I think the '''redirect''' is appropriate for now. If the amount of information gets larger, then it can be broken out when it needs to be. [[User:ShaneKing|Shane King]] 00:31, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:31, 20 December 2004
A nonexistent company from a fictional TV series, non-notable and nonencyclopedic, and could never be expanded beyond stub length. DreamGuy 15:36, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Art Vandelay and Vandelay Industries show up in multiple episodes. It may be a fictional company, but it's a well-known fictional company. Gsd97jks 16:03, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge this cruft. Wyss 16:44, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I've been bold and merged it into George Costanza, making Vandelay Industries a redirect. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:43, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Works for me. Yay being bold. �xfeff;--fvw* 18:14, 2004 Dec 18 (UTC)
- Agreed; merge and redirect. Samaritan 19:28, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Yeah, that works too. Gsd97jks 22:37, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Make separate article to encourage expansion. Notable topic within the context of the series. Everyking 06:11, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect: DCEdwards1966 06:57, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think the redirect is appropriate for now. If the amount of information gets larger, then it can be broken out when it needs to be. Shane King 00:31, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)