Talk:Northeast Syrtis

Peer Feedback from Ivan

Hi Justin! These are some suggestions for your article:

• The location may not be well-defined. The size of the map is great but you could add more information to enrich it (latitude/longtitude marks, N/S pole in the general Mars view, scale etc.). you may try to adopt a location template like Jezero Crater or Isidis Planitia did. You should also cite the location in the text.
• The table of testable hypotheses would involve plagiarism. Rearranging the order from Bramble (2017) is equal to taken directly rather than modification. Instead, you could summarise the result of Bramble (2017) and describe and elaborate the feature. Images from satellite could help as well.
• You could explain more on the importance of this place and features related to Mars 2020 mission.
• Some parts missed citation. You should cite the original stratigraphic column in the illustration, area of TRN ellipse (or eclipse?), sulphate formation on Mars in the introduction.

Cheers,
Ivancyyip (talk) 06:48, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Couple things that came to mind: - better organisational structure of the stratigraphy section could provide more clarification of the information - further to the stratigraphy, a broader geologic overview of mars with a comparison to the landing site could compliment this section - explanations on the importance and outcomes of testing the proposed hypothesis?