Talk:Ecclesiastical Insurance: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:20, 24 January 2019

Gloucestershire Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Claimants Bill of Rights was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 August 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Ecclesiastical Insurance. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Text of merged article

The Claimants Bill of Rights is a non-legalese 'survivor friendly' version of Ecclesiastical Insurance protocol begun in July 2016 which relates to how insurers and solicitors deal with abuse cases. It was formulated primarily in relation to abuse claims within the Church of England and Anglican Church, to inform how other churches and their insurance companies respond to abuse survivors. It was arrived at by negotiation with a survivor as part of her settlement, with the help of a solicitor campaigner from MACSAS, an organisation which supports church abuse survivors. It covers such areas as fairness, respect and empathy in settlement process, pastoral care, access to counselling, statute of limitations, power imbalance, medical evaluation, Joint Settlement Meeting (“JSM”), confidentiality clauses.

Copied here for ease of reference.--Mervyn (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ref for this if appropriate is: http://www.ecclesiastical.com/fororganisations/claims/abuse-claims/index.aspx --Mervyn (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Lycetts

Added link to Lycetts(new page) - one of the subsidiaries of Ecclesiastical.^[1]^[2]Joelionheart (talk) 11:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elliott Review. Criticism of Ecclesiastical & Archbishop Welby's office

New section added. Needs developping. But made a start.Joelionheart (talk) 17:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism by Bishops

New section addded. Hope it's accurate. Not yet complete and will almost certainly need further addition and editing. Sad to see branded logo disappear - I thought it was customary to have corporate logos on wiki. Apologies for my error. Joelionheart (talk) 20:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added new history section

To make it easier for readers and to add more context to the history of the company. Hope I have cited everything correctly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.128.165 (talk) 09:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 108.171.128.165 (talk) 11:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updated history section

Added more detail and references to history section, particularly around founding members

Was unable to reference the specific PDF from Companies House but worth taking a look! Pauleccles84 (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox amends

Updated info box with founder info and former names as cited in history section and updated parent company and subsidiaries to accurately reflect structure. All changes made to ensure consistency with cited sources in the article.

Tried to add a logo but not sure of best way to do this as it was previously removed from WikiCommons, please can you advise the best course of action? Pauleccles84 (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Core Groups

Updated Elliott Review section with cited reference to criticism of Ecclesiastical lawyer present at pastoral core groups.^[3] Joelionheart (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Open Letter to Welby

New section added. Open Letter to Welby concerning amongst other things Ecclesiastical's litigation strategies, signed by 20 people including senior members of CofE Synod and a founding member of Archbishop's Council and others.^[4] Joelionheart (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliation to Church of England

New section added. With several references in media to confusion and uncertainty about its relationship to Church of England, this new section will hopefully clarify these questions. Have moved the Gloucester Cathedral celebration with reading of letter from Archbishop Welby to this new section - seems correct section for this citation. Hope fellow editors will agree. Joelionheart (talk) 23:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.ecclesiastical.com/general/careers/graduatescheme/a-brief-introduction/index.aspx
^ http://www.netimesmagazine.co.uk/10-questions-angus-keate/
^ "Sarah Mullally welcomed by survivors as Church battles string of abuse criticisms". Christian Today. 19 Dec 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
^ "Archbishop pressed to bring in mandatory reporting of abuse". Ekklesia. Retrieved 14 January 2019.

[1] ttp://www.ecclesiastical.com/general/careers/graduatescheme/a-brief-introduction/index.aspx

[2] ttp://www.netimesmagazine.co.uk/10-questions-angus-keate/

[3] "Sarah Mullally welcomed by survivors as Church battles string of abuse criticisms". Christian Today. 19 Dec 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2019.

[4] "Archbishop pressed to bring in mandatory reporting of abuse". Ekklesia. Retrieved 14 January 2019.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 == Open Letter to Welby ==
 New section added. Open Letter to Welby concerning amongst other things Ecclesiastical's litigation strategies, signed by 20 people including senior members of CofE [[Synod]] and a founding member of [[Archbishop's Council]] and others.<ref>{{cite web |title=Archbishop pressed to bring in mandatory reporting of abuse |url=http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/24759 |website=Ekklesia |accessdate=14 January 2019}}</ref> [[User:Joelionheart|Joelionheart]] ([[User talk:Joelionheart|talk]]) 15:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
+== Affiliation to Church of England ==
+New section added. With several references in media to confusion and uncertainty about its relationship to Church of England, this new section will hopefully clarify these questions. Have moved the Gloucester Cathedral celebration with reading of letter from Archbishop Welby to this new section - seems correct section for this citation. Hope fellow editors will agree. [[User:Joelionheart|Joelionheart]] ([[User talk:Joelionheart|talk]]) 23:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)