Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danainlondon: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Danainlondon - "→‎Comments by other users: "
Line 19: Line 19:
The page [[User:Cosykenzo]] was not created by myself but by a friend who does not have the same conflict of interest as I. I reached out to them as they have had more Wikipedia experience and asked what I can do in regards to the claims being made against myself by [[User:Melcous|Melcous]] as well as others, as I realised I had done something wrong and wanted to do my best to revert the damage. Instead of providing advice, [[User:Cosykenzo]] created an account and began reverting my edits. This is not what I had requested and I am now disheartened to see what was initially a decision to fix the situation to actually make it worse. I asked [[User:Cosykenzo]] to delete the account but have since learnt this is not possible.
The page [[User:Cosykenzo]] was not created by myself but by a friend who does not have the same conflict of interest as I. I reached out to them as they have had more Wikipedia experience and asked what I can do in regards to the claims being made against myself by [[User:Melcous|Melcous]] as well as others, as I realised I had done something wrong and wanted to do my best to revert the damage. Instead of providing advice, [[User:Cosykenzo]] created an account and began reverting my edits. This is not what I had requested and I am now disheartened to see what was initially a decision to fix the situation to actually make it worse. I asked [[User:Cosykenzo]] to delete the account but have since learnt this is not possible.


I have no intention to break guidelines or hurt others and rather my previous mistakes have been a misunderstanding in which I am embarrassed. Moving forward, I am currently proposing edits on Talk pages rather than editing myself as per [[User:Melcous]] explained to me on my talk page. Any further discussion would be much appreciated. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Danainlondon|Danainlondon]] ([[User talk:Danainlondon#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Danainlondon|contribs]]) 12:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I have no intention to break guidelines or hurt others and rather my previous mistakes have been a misunderstanding in which I am embarrassed. Moving forward, I am currently proposing edits on Talk pages rather than editing myself as per [[User:Melcous]] explained to me on my talk page. Any further discussion would be much appreciated. [[User:Danainlondon|Danainlondon]] ([[User talk:Danainlondon|talk]]) 12:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 12:22, 4 February 2019


Danainlondon

Danainlondon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

04 February 2019

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Cosy re-added (1) Dana's spam (2, 3) to Open banking. At present all 3 of Cosy's edits have inserted Centtrip into articles. Cabayi (talk) 12:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The page User:Cosykenzo was not created by myself but by a friend who does not have the same conflict of interest as I. I reached out to them as they have had more Wikipedia experience and asked what I can do in regards to the claims being made against myself by Melcous as well as others, as I realised I had done something wrong and wanted to do my best to revert the damage. Instead of providing advice, User:Cosykenzo created an account and began reverting my edits. This is not what I had requested and I am now disheartened to see what was initially a decision to fix the situation to actually make it worse. I asked User:Cosykenzo to delete the account but have since learnt this is not possible.

I have no intention to break guidelines or hurt others and rather my previous mistakes have been a misunderstanding in which I am embarrassed. Moving forward, I am currently proposing edits on Talk pages rather than editing myself as per User:Melcous explained to me on my talk page. Any further discussion would be much appreciated. Danainlondon (talk) 12:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments