Anti-rival good: Difference between revisions
m Rearranged things a bit, to make it read better. |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This term is a neologism, coined by {{Harv|Weber}} to describe goods created by a process of reciprocal exchange for mutual benefit, such as open source software. |
This term is a neologism, coined by {{Harv|Weber}} to describe goods created by a process of reciprocal exchange for mutual benefit, such as open source software. A Wikipedia entry is an example of an anti-rival good. |
||
An anti-rival good meets the test of a [[public good]] because it is non-excludable (freely available to all) and non-rival (consumption by one person does not reduce the amount available for others). However it has the additional quality of being created by private individuals for common benefit without being motivated by pure [[altruism]] (because the individual contributor receives benefits from the contributions of others). The distinction is explained by [[Lawrence Lessig]]: |
An anti-rival good meets the test of a [[public good]] because it is non-excludable (freely available to all) and non-rival (consumption by one person does not reduce the amount available for others). However it has the additional quality of being created by private individuals for common benefit without being motivated by pure [[altruism]] (because the individual contributor receives benefits from the contributions of others). The distinction is explained by [[Lawrence Lessig]]: |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Although the term "anti-rival good" is a neologism, this category of goods may be neither new nor specific to the internet era. According to Lessig, a particular language also meets the criteria; "Language is an anti-rival good: not only does your speaking English not restrict me, your speaking it benefits me. The more people who speak a language, the more useful that language is... to those who speak it." |
Although the term "anti-rival good" is a neologism, this category of goods may be neither new nor specific to the internet era. According to Lessig, a particular language also meets the criteria; "Language is an anti-rival good: not only does your speaking English not restrict me, your speaking it benefits me. The more people who speak a language, the more useful that language is... to those who speak it." |
||
The term also invokes [[Reciprocity (cultural anthropology)]] and the concept of a [[gift economy]]. See also [[Private good]] and [[Good (economics and accounting)]]. |
|||
==References and further reading== |
==References and further reading== |
||
Revision as of 07:20, 18 November 2006
This term is a neologism, coined by (Weber) to describe goods created by a process of reciprocal exchange for mutual benefit, such as open source software. A Wikipedia entry is an example of an anti-rival good.
An anti-rival good meets the test of a public good because it is non-excludable (freely available to all) and non-rival (consumption by one person does not reduce the amount available for others). However it has the additional quality of being created by private individuals for common benefit without being motivated by pure altruism (because the individual contributor receives benefits from the contributions of others). The distinction is explained by Lawrence Lessig:
It's not just that code is non-rival; it's that code in particular, and (at least some) knowledge in general, is, as Weber calls it, 'anti-rival'. I am not only not harmed when you share an anti-rival good: I benefit.
The production of anti-rival goods appears to benefit from the network effect. Leung (2006) offers this quote from Weber (2004):
Under conditions of anti-rivalness, as the size of the Internet-connected group increases, and there is a heterogeneous distribution of motivations with people who have a high level of interest and some resources to invest, then the large group is more likely, all things being equal, to provide the good than is a small group.
Although the term "anti-rival good" is a neologism, this category of goods may be neither new nor specific to the internet era. According to Lessig, a particular language also meets the criteria; "Language is an anti-rival good: not only does your speaking English not restrict me, your speaking it benefits me. The more people who speak a language, the more useful that language is... to those who speak it."
The term also invokes Reciprocity (cultural anthropology) and the concept of a gift economy. See also Private good and Good (economics and accounting).
References and further reading
- Lessig, L. "Do You Floss?". London Review of Books. Retrieved November 14.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help); Unknown parameter|accessyear=ignored (|access-date=suggested) (help) - Leung, T. "(Review) The Success of Open Source". Sauria Associates. Retrieved November 15.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help); Unknown parameter|accessyear=ignored (|access-date=suggested) (help) - Template:Harvard reference.
- Template:Harvard reference.