Talk:PureScript: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:42, 19 March 2019

This article was nominated for deletion on March 31, 2015. The result of the discussion was delete.

Add the following sections:

Code examples

At least a "Hello World"
Maybe also a JavaScript FFI example, highlightling the ease of integration with existing JS-codebases/frameworks

Implementations

Mention alternative implementations, in particular purescript-native which targets C++ as a backend instead of EcmaScript.

Applications

Industry: There are already several companys which rely on PureScript for a significant portion of their codebase. A few of the major ones would be worth mentioning here, underlining the real-world significance and strength of PureScript.

Ecosystem

Community

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
  |date1 = March 31, 2015 |result1 = '''delete''' |page1 = PureScript
 }}
+== Proposed improvements: ==
+Add the following sections:
+'''Code examples'''
+* At least a "Hello World"
+* Maybe also a JavaScript FFI example, highlightling the ease of integration with existing JS-codebases/frameworks
+'''Implementations'''
+* Mention alternative implementations, in particular purescript-native which targets C++ as a backend instead of EcmaScript.
+'''Applications'''
+* Industry: There are already several companys which rely on PureScript for a significant portion of their codebase. A few of the major ones would be worth mentioning here, underlining the real-world significance and strength of PureScript.
+'''Ecosystem'''
+* documentation on pursuit
+* Pulp
+* Bower
+* psc-package
+* Editor integrations (vscode, atom, vim/emacs)
+'''Community'''
+* Maybe mention the discourse, pursuit