User talk:71.224.251.239: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Spygate: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
So odd-Peter Strozk has a page, Lisa Page has no WP page? |
So odd-Peter Strozk has a page, Lisa Page has no WP page? |
||
She must not be notable enough despite being accused by the president of treason. |
She must not be notable enough despite being accused by the president of treason. |
||
#MAKEWPGREATAGAIN |
|||
== Spygate == |
|||
Please stay on-topic. The words "spy" and "spying" are being thrown around, but "Spygate" has a specific historical context, and nothing that happens afterward can change that. Trump used the term Spygate to refer to [[Stefan Halper]]'s contacts with three members of the Trump campaign. Whenever you get away from that topic and call it "Spygate", you're off-topic. The unproven "wiretapping of Trump Tower" and the surveillance of Carter Page based on court-ordered FISA warrants are not part of Spygate. Some use the words spy and spying about them, but that doesn't make them part of Spygate. We have plenty of articles about all of these things. They don't get all propped into one article. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) 04:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:25, 17 April 2019
The main source of those problems is not mysterious. The loose collective running the site today, estimated to be 90 percent male, operates a crushing bureaucracy with an often abrasive atmosphere that deters newcomers who might increase participation in Wikipedia and broaden its coverage.
The Decline of Wikipedia - MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/s/520446/the-decline-of-Wikipedia
So odd-Peter Strozk has a page, Lisa Page has no WP page? She must not be notable enough despite being accused by the president of treason.