Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Robert Post.jpg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Replaceable fair use disputed |
m →Replaceable fair use disputed: Typo |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Again, this image meets the criteria listed in the Promotional tag and in Wikipedia's Fair Use policy. Robert Post is little known, most of the images are from his site or commercial news sources, I haven't been able to find a free alternative. The image is clearly attributed to the press/promotional section on his site, and is only used in the article about him. This is no different than using a cover of an album in an article about the album. |
Again, this image meets the criteria listed in the Promotional tag and in Wikipedia's Fair Use policy. Robert Post is little known, most of the images are from his site or commercial news sources, I haven't been able to find a free alternative. The image is clearly attributed to the press/promotional section on his site, and is only used in the article about him. This is no different than using a cover of an album in an article about the album. |
||
Also, I'm not a copyright newb. I looked high and low for free images before I considered using any from a press site. People need to do a search on their own before tagging images as " |
Also, I'm not a copyright newb. I looked high and low for free images before I considered using any from a press site. People need to do a search on their own before tagging images as "replaceable." |
||
--[[User:Foofy|Foofy]] 01:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
--[[User:Foofy|Foofy]] 01:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:20, 26 November 2006
Replaceable fair use disputed
Again, this image meets the criteria listed in the Promotional tag and in Wikipedia's Fair Use policy. Robert Post is little known, most of the images are from his site or commercial news sources, I haven't been able to find a free alternative. The image is clearly attributed to the press/promotional section on his site, and is only used in the article about him. This is no different than using a cover of an album in an article about the album.
Also, I'm not a copyright newb. I looked high and low for free images before I considered using any from a press site. People need to do a search on their own before tagging images as "replaceable."
