Talk:Despotate of Dobruja: Difference between revisions
Madalinfocsa (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Let me explain you some simple facts: It is obvious that the anexation of this mediaeval principality in 1388-89 by Wallachia was than seen rather as a liberation. If you don't like it because you are a nationalist, that doesn't mean it's not true. In 1388 the Ottomans conquered that land - that we both agree, ok ? So it could be said, no doubt about it, that the Christians (being either Romanians or Bulgarians, it doesn't matter) liberated it. Back in those times NOBODY maked the difference between my people and yours, Mircea the Elder was seen as a liberator (there are contemporary descriptions that mention this fact), and modern-day nationalistic propaganda has no place in here ! |
Let me explain you some simple facts: It is obvious that the anexation of this mediaeval principality in 1388-89 by Wallachia was than seen rather as a liberation. If you don't like it because you are a nationalist, that doesn't mean it's not true. In 1388 the Ottomans conquered that land - that we both agree, ok ? So it could be said, no doubt about it, that the Christians (being either Romanians or Bulgarians, it doesn't matter) liberated it. Back in those times NOBODY maked the difference between my people and yours, Mircea the Elder was seen as a liberator (there are contemporary descriptions that mention this fact), and modern-day nationalistic propaganda has no place in here ! |
||
[[User:Madalinfocsa|Madalinfocsa]] 20:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:Madalinfocsa|Madalinfocsa]] 20:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
Exactly Madalinfocsa! The inhabitants considered the annexation of the territory by Mircea as liberation of Muslim Rule by a fellow ORTHODOX Christian ruler. |
|||
22:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:22, 26 November 2006
Todor, what are you trying to demonstrate by changing some words here (for example "liberating" changed with "conquered")??? This could easily be seen by anybody as vandalism. Let me explain you some simple facts: It is obvious that the anexation of this mediaeval principality in 1388-89 by Wallachia was than seen rather as a liberation. If you don't like it because you are a nationalist, that doesn't mean it's not true. In 1388 the Ottomans conquered that land - that we both agree, ok ? So it could be said, no doubt about it, that the Christians (being either Romanians or Bulgarians, it doesn't matter) liberated it. Back in those times NOBODY maked the difference between my people and yours, Mircea the Elder was seen as a liberator (there are contemporary descriptions that mention this fact), and modern-day nationalistic propaganda has no place in here ! Madalinfocsa 20:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC) Exactly Madalinfocsa! The inhabitants considered the annexation of the territory by Mircea as liberation of Muslim Rule by a fellow ORTHODOX Christian ruler. 22:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)