Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Daveydweeb

Daveydweeb

Voice your opinion (1/0/0) Ending 02:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Nomination by Spawn Man (talk · contribs)

Daveydweeb (talk · contribs) – This user is basically anawesome editor. He helps out in all forms of Wikipedia & is always civil. Daveydweeb knows the site's protocol & would make a great administrator. I don't need to say much about this user, his efforts should do the rest of the talking. Thanks, Spawn Man 02:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Co-nomination by riana_dzasta (talk · contribs)

If Spawn Man doesn't mind, I'd like to co-nominate Daveydweeb for adminship (because I've been saying I will for a long time). Daveydweeb previously contributed under the name RandyWang, until concerns about the nature of his username came up ^[1]in his last RfA. The other major concern which arose was misuse of speedy deletion tags; other editors were concerned ^[2]that David tagged articles too hastily, and did not warn article creators enough. However, he is currently undergoing admin coaching from Yanksox, and even a quick overview of that page shows that he is willing and able to learn from past mistakes, and that his recent attempts at new page patrolling have been non-controversial and following policy.

Daveydweeb has over 4500 edits under his belt, well-distributed across the namespaces. His contributions to projectspace are particularly impressive - he is an active participant in AfD^{[3], [4], [5]} and WikiProject Computer and video games. He has also given multiple helpful editor reviews ^{[6], [7], [8]}, regularly gives his opinion at RfAs , and is one of the Wikipedia Weekly podcasters, where - if you take a listen </plug> - he has consistently shown his ability to discuss policy, procedures and happenings in a calm and rational manner.

David doesn't do much recent changes patrol anymore, as his focus appears to have shifted to NPP. However, judging by his previous reverts ^{[9], [10], [11]},I have no doubt that he would be able to handle this aspect of adminship. As for other mainspace contributions, Daveydweeb has a good article under his belt with Personal computer game; thus he can appreciate this aspect of editing, and how hard it can be for contributors to raise articles to such high standards.

David's interactions with other users are unfailingly polite ^[12], civil and friendly ^[13], and while he has a sense of humour, I've never seen him cross the line. He welcomes new users ^[14], helps them out ^[15], and is willing to explain policies ^[16].

As for the paperwork - 100% edit summary usage, short signature, non-controversial userpage, talk page archiving.

I think all the problems from David's last RfA have been worked on and improved on, and I see no reason why he should not make a very fine administrator. He shows knowledge of policy, civility, and understands the fundamentals of NPOV, NOR, BITE and our deletion policies. David would make a diligent and helpful admin, and I'm sure he will continue to be an asset to the encyclopedia. riana_dzasta 07:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

General comments

---

Discussion

Support

1. Nominator support - Of course I'm going to support. :) Spawn Man 02:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral