Wikipedia talk:Buying Wikipedia articles in print or another form: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→a CD/DVD or print version of Wikipedia: new section |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Would [[Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License]] require that the license be printed along with any content? What about attributing the authors? For a book, that might not be a problem, but for a single article or two. Would printing a link to a specific revision on Wikipedia be enough to satisfy? [[User:Cander0000|Cander0000]] ([[User talk:Cander0000|talk]]) 05:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
Would [[Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License]] require that the license be printed along with any content? What about attributing the authors? For a book, that might not be a problem, but for a single article or two. Would printing a link to a specific revision on Wikipedia be enough to satisfy? [[User:Cander0000|Cander0000]] ([[User talk:Cander0000|talk]]) 05:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
== a CD/DVD or print version of Wikipedia == |
|||
"The Wikimedia Foundation also plans to release a CD/DVD or print version of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia." Is this claim still valid? --[[Special:Contributions/2001:BB8:2002:1500:914D:2CE5:FEDF:37CC|2001:BB8:2002:1500:914D:2CE5:FEDF:37CC]] ([[User talk:2001:BB8:2002:1500:914D:2CE5:FEDF:37CC|talk]]) 10:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:57, 12 September 2019
Template:WikiProject Wikipedia-Books
Licence requirements
Would Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License require that the license be printed along with any content? What about attributing the authors? For a book, that might not be a problem, but for a single article or two. Would printing a link to a specific revision on Wikipedia be enough to satisfy? Cander0000 (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
a CD/DVD or print version of Wikipedia
"The Wikimedia Foundation also plans to release a CD/DVD or print version of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia." Is this claim still valid? --2001:BB8:2002:1500:914D:2CE5:FEDF:37CC (talk) 10:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)