User talk:69.169.157.217/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
10658513uvu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
10658513uvu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Finally, paste your peer-review letter into the talk page for the article. |
Finally, paste your peer-review letter into the talk page for the article. |
||
Looking at the lead by itself, do I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic? |
* Looking at the lead by itself, do I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic? |
||
Looking at the lead again after reading the rest of the article, does the lead reflect the most important information? |
* Looking at the lead again after reading the rest of the article, does the lead reflect the most important information? |
||
Does the lead give more weight to certain parts of the article over others? Is anything missing? Is anything redundant? |
* Does the lead give more weight to certain parts of the article over others? Is anything missing? Is anything redundant? |
||
Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? |
* Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? |
||
Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? |
* Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? |
||
Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing? |
* Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing? |
||
Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? |
* Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? |
||
Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article? |
* Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article? |
||
Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." |
* Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." |
||
Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say..." |
* Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say..." |
||
Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. |
* Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. |
||
Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? |
* Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? |
||
Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. |
* Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. |
||
Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! |
* Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! |
||
* |
|||
Leave a message |
* Leave a message |
||
Latest revision as of 02:36, 10 October 2019
Peer Review Guidelines: Peer-review three articles from our course. Because not everyone chooses this assignment, there may not be enough for you to peer review. In that case, you can peer-review existing articles that need improvement. You will do the preliminary work for the peer-review in your own Sandbox and then copy it into the talk page of the relevant article when you are done. Here is how you will do it: In your Sandbox, copy and paste the questions provided in the peer-review training and answer them for each article. Make sure to include all those from the Follow Their Lead, A Clear Structure, A Balancing Act, Neutral Content, and Reliable Sources sections. After answering all those questions for the article, write a peer-review letter using the structure provided in the Share the Love section. Finally, paste your peer-review letter into the talk page for the article.
- Looking at the lead by itself, do I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic?
- Looking at the lead again after reading the rest of the article, does the lead reflect the most important information?
- Does the lead give more weight to certain parts of the article over others? Is anything missing? Is anything redundant?
- Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)?
- Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic?
- Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing?
- Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?
- Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article?
- Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y."
- Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say..."
- Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic.
- Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors?
- Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view.
- Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately!
- Leave a message