User talk:BhaiSaab: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I see a [[Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Subhash_bose_%282nd%29|sockpuppet]]. [[User:Subhash bose|The sockpuppeteer]] states he's Hindu. [[User:Hkelkar|The sockpuppet]] claims to be Jewish. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith&diff=85602578&oldid=85507859 don't assume good faith] of the sockpuppet for three months (because policy does not require me to extend the courtesy) while, at the same time, the admins are [[User_talk:Blnguyen/Archive24#Sockpuppets|oblivious]] to the fact. Arbcom [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#Sockpuppets_2|decides]] that I had been right about the sockpuppetry. The sockpuppet [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#Hkelkar_and_socks|is banned]]. I [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#BhaiSaab|am banned]] for [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#Provocative_behavior_by_BhaiSaab|my behavior]] while having assumed bad faith. That behavior includes "being anti-Semitic" (or as I would say it, defending my country's President) to a sockpuppeteer who Blnguyen now knows is actually a Hindu. Admins are all off the hook for their failure to see what a normal user could see for three months. Can anyone tell me if [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABhaiSaab%2FA5&diff=82382016&oldid=82255778 this] would have happened if the admins knew, like I knew, that I was speaking with a Hindu and why Iranians can't praise their President? [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 17:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
I see a [[Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Subhash_bose_%282nd%29|sockpuppet]]. [[User:Subhash bose|The sockpuppeteer]] states he's Hindu. [[User:Hkelkar|The sockpuppet]] claims to be Jewish. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith&diff=85602578&oldid=85507859 don't assume good faith] of the sockpuppet for three months (because policy does not require me to extend the courtesy) while, at the same time, the admins are [[User_talk:Blnguyen/Archive24#Sockpuppets|oblivious]] to the fact. Arbcom [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#Sockpuppets_2|decides]] that I had been right about the sockpuppetry. The sockpuppet [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#Hkelkar_and_socks|is banned]]. I [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#BhaiSaab|am banned]] for [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar/Proposed_decision#Provocative_behavior_by_BhaiSaab|my behavior]] while having assumed bad faith. That behavior includes "being anti-Semitic" (or as I would say it, defending my country's President) to a sockpuppeteer who Blnguyen now knows is actually a Hindu. Admins are all off the hook for their failure to see what a normal user could see for three months. Can anyone tell me if [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABhaiSaab%2FA5&diff=82382016&oldid=82255778 this] would have happened if the admins knew, like I knew, that I was speaking with a Hindu and why Iranians can't praise their President? [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 17:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
:That's the tip of the iceberg of your disruptive editing. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 21:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
:That's the tip of the iceberg of your disruptive editing. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 21:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
::And of course, a member of the "anti-Muslim brigade" replies first. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 01:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Goodbye== |
==Goodbye== |
||
Revision as of 01:57, 10 December 2006
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
My Story
I see a sockpuppet. The sockpuppeteer states he's Hindu. The sockpuppet claims to be Jewish. I don't assume good faith of the sockpuppet for three months (because policy does not require me to extend the courtesy) while, at the same time, the admins are oblivious to the fact. Arbcom decides that I had been right about the sockpuppetry. The sockpuppet is banned. I am banned for my behavior while having assumed bad faith. That behavior includes "being anti-Semitic" (or as I would say it, defending my country's President) to a sockpuppeteer who Blnguyen now knows is actually a Hindu. Admins are all off the hook for their failure to see what a normal user could see for three months. Can anyone tell me if this would have happened if the admins knew, like I knew, that I was speaking with a Hindu and why Iranians can't praise their President? BhaiSaab talk 17:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's the tip of the iceberg of your disruptive editing. Arrow740 21:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- And of course, a member of the "anti-Muslim brigade" replies first. BhaiSaab talk 01:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Goodbye
See you BhaiSaab! (→Netscott) 16:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good... hopefully we'll both be around. I suspect you may "pop" up in the meantime though... lol! Take it easy. (→Netscott) 16:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)