Jump to content

Talk:LCM-1E: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add a heading
Line 9: Line 9:
http://www.army.gov.au/Our-work/Equipment-and-clothing/Vehicles/M1-Abrams-tank
http://www.army.gov.au/Our-work/Equipment-and-clothing/Vehicles/M1-Abrams-tank
Article has been amended <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aussienscale|Aussienscale]] ([[User talk:Aussienscale|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aussienscale|contribs]]) 09:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Article has been amended <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aussienscale|Aussienscale]] ([[User talk:Aussienscale|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aussienscale|contribs]]) 09:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Costs not mentioned ==

In the current fire crisis in Australia these ships should be used to evacuate people, but they are a no-show. We have four of these things - so how much money have we spent for something that does not help in an emergency? We need to know how much they cost, generally. In this current climate we need to confront the politicians for spending x-amount of Dollars for what? If there is a reasonable explanation, why not talk about it? [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:A02F:F400:3039:38D4:B235:3366|2001:8003:A02F:F400:3039:38D4:B235:3366]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:A02F:F400:3039:38D4:B235:3366|talk]]) 23:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:31, 2 January 2020

WikiProject iconShips Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / European / Spanish Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
Spanish military history task force

Abrams tanks

The attached article on the LCM-1E not being able to carry the Australian Abrams is rubbish, The tanks are not too heavy, it is a certification issue as the LHD's and the LCM have not reached FOC yet, this is a normal process and as certification continues, fuller capabilities will be realised. The Australian Abrams is on par weight wise with the Leopard 2's that Spain operate from the exact same craft with no problems at all, see references:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_2E

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_Abrams http://www.army.gov.au/Our-work/Equipment-and-clothing/Vehicles/M1-Abrams-tank Article has been amended — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussienscale (talkcontribs) 09:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Costs not mentioned

In the current fire crisis in Australia these ships should be used to evacuate people, but they are a no-show. We have four of these things - so how much money have we spent for something that does not help in an emergency? We need to know how much they cost, generally. In this current climate we need to confront the politicians for spending x-amount of Dollars for what? If there is a reasonable explanation, why not talk about it? 2001:8003:A02F:F400:3039:38D4:B235:3366 (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]