User talk:Stone Routes: Difference between revisions
Stone Routes (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Stone Routes (talk | contribs) approval for new lead |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Done and Dusted. It's been a tight wire and I had to do it rapid. I'm easing off now (I hope) to allow the dust to settle[[User:Stone Routes|Stone Routes]] ([[User talk:Stone Routes#top|talk]]) 17:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
Done and Dusted. It's been a tight wire and I had to do it rapid. I'm easing off now (I hope) to allow the dust to settle[[User:Stone Routes|Stone Routes]] ([[User talk:Stone Routes#top|talk]]) 17:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
2020 |
|||
Substantial update to lead section to summarise and give the page an accessible overview. |
Substantial update to lead section to summarise and give the page an accessible overview. |
||
Approval to remove wiki warning on top on main page sought. |
Approval to remove wiki warning on top on main page sought. |
||
Revision as of 13:49, 26 January 2020
Hello, Stone Routes, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
== Your submission at Chuckmuck (August 1 and 6) ==has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Average Wikipedian was:This submission is not adequately supported by Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified.
The Average Wikipedian (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
The reason left by Happysquirrel was:=Sourcing is much better. Please see how they should be formatted. Please organize text into organized sections (ex. etymology, history, description ...) and provide needed references.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.
Happy Squirrel (talk) 17:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 9 August * my 60th birthday !Stone Routes (talk) 10:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC) this is for Ellie[1], the mystical beastStone Routes (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC) and Iona and Belinda of courseStone Routes (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuckmuck has been accepted
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- So, after some thought, I decided that since the remaining cleanup, though necessary, was no longer as drastic and since the amount of information present was substantial, I decided to pass the article. Congratulations! I never give new articles a rating higher than C, and I rarely even go that far. In this case, your draft was a real uncut jewel. With a bit of cleanup, it is really something exceptional. With a bit more cleanup, especially wikilinking, I could see it making B-class in the near future. Keep working on it! I am still there to help if you need me. Happy editing! Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Stone Routes (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Done and Dusted. It's been a tight wire and I had to do it rapid. I'm easing off now (I hope) to allow the dust to settleStone Routes (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
2020
Substantial update to lead section to summarise and give the page an accessible overview.
Approval to remove wiki warning on top on main page sought.
Also peacock term and original research issues addressed