User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions
Black Kite (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
I am blocked for wanting to remove soapboxing? [[User:Jfbongarçon|Jfbongarçon]] ([[User talk:Jfbongarçon|talk]]) 10:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC) |
I am blocked for wanting to remove soapboxing? [[User:Jfbongarçon|Jfbongarçon]] ([[User talk:Jfbongarçon|talk]]) 10:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
* No, you're blocked for twice removing sourced facts from the article and then calling the user who correctly reverted you "fascistic". You are not (currently) blocked from any other page except [[Oscillococcinum]] but I would strongly suggest not doing the same thing elsewhere. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 10:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC) |
* No, you're blocked for twice removing sourced facts from the article and then calling the user who correctly reverted you "fascistic". You are not (currently) blocked from any other page except [[Oscillococcinum]] but I would strongly suggest not doing the same thing elsewhere. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 10:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
==High BK== |
|||
Could I ask a favour, never having had an article pulled as non-notable, that I was working on? The [[Hayley McLaughlin]] article—can you direct me to where I might find the last version of it, before it was deleted? I had put in a great deal of work, repairing citations, and if she does indeed become recognizably notable in future, I would rather we not start from scratch. (FOr a start, there were at least a half dozen good citations there, and for such entertainment articles, I have no time to reproduce already performed research.). Respond here, given my IP status? Cheers, thanks. [The former Prof.] [[Special:Contributions/2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F|2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F]] ([[User talk:2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F|talk]]) 06:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:34, 31 January 2020
 | For Talk Page Archives, click here. |
| “You’re obliged to pretend respect for people and institutions you think absurd. You live attached in a cowardly fashion to moral and social conventions you despise, condemn, and know lack of all foundation." Octave Mirbeau |
2601:143:4200:E070:0:0:0:0/64
Hello, Black Kite! Continuation of this story. Could you set the semi-protection on the page "Crimean Tatars"?--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Blocked from oscillococcinum
I am blocked for wanting to remove soapboxing? Jfbongarçon (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, you're blocked for twice removing sourced facts from the article and then calling the user who correctly reverted you "fascistic". You are not (currently) blocked from any other page except Oscillococcinum but I would strongly suggest not doing the same thing elsewhere. Black Kite (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
High BK
Could I ask a favour, never having had an article pulled as non-notable, that I was working on? The Hayley McLaughlin article—can you direct me to where I might find the last version of it, before it was deleted? I had put in a great deal of work, repairing citations, and if she does indeed become recognizably notable in future, I would rather we not start from scratch. (FOr a start, there were at least a half dozen good citations there, and for such entertainment articles, I have no time to reproduce already performed research.). Respond here, given my IP status? Cheers, thanks. [The former Prof.] 2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F (talk) 06:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)