User talk:Bradv: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:39, 29 April 2020

Template:X1/style.css

Could you please delete this as G2 as well? (I can't tag the page due to a technical glitch, so I originally put the CSD tag on the talk page) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pppery, done. – bradv🍁 02:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I want to learn how to add image to the page

I want to learn how to edit the page and how to add image to the page. All the coding and citing and how to secure the page. Fizzaabbas05 (talk) 09:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, what page do you need help with? – bradv🍁 15:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello bradv!

Hello bradv, the person you were talking to on kiwi, yeah that's me. Just wanted to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucasA04 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LucasA04, welcome to Wikipedia, and congratulations on creating your first article. Please feel free to reach out any time you need help. – bradv🍁 03:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bradv, Always LucasA04 (talk) 04:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about the accusation

No question about it, I was trolling, so I guess you did feed me. Although, to the extent I had anything specific in mind with that foolish prank (other than blowing off steam), it was to explicitly point out the fantastic ridiculousness of the suggestion, and invite some sober reminders for the overly credulous out there, which you did very nicely. (While it lasted.) Anyway, have a nice day (and I mean that sincerely, not in the trolling sense). —Steve Summit (talk) 17:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scs, your post caused me to wade onto the reference desk for the first time in about 10 years, which I immediately regretted. Honestly I don't see the difference between that thread and much of the nonsense that gets posted there, but raising awareness of the buffoonery and incompetence at the highest levels during this crisis seems to me a laudable activity. Stay safe. – bradv🍁 17:56, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion consensus.

Hey there, hope you're going good. recently you had relisted the deleted nomination for the page that has been nominated for deletion since 19 days

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Camila_Guiribitey

Could you please help me by suggesting ways to fasten the deletion process review? (Sorry for bad English) Thanks 2019KB (talk) 07:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2019KB, what's the rush? There is WP:NODEADLINE, and we need to make sure that the decision to keep or delete the article reflects the consensus of the community. In this case I'm hoping for more reviews by experienced editors. – bradv🍁 16:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm new on Wikipedia and not sure but the link you has shared of WP:NODEADLINE has a section which says there are certain deadline in Wikipedia

Deletion discussions should usually be finished after a maximum of 21 days. Article deletion discussions have a deadline of seven days which may be extended to 14 or 21 days (in rare cases, discussions can run longer). As such, Article Rescue Squadron always works to a deadline.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline#Deadlines_in_Wikipedia

Again I might be wrong but I don't think that article is eligible for rare case. Please let me know, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2019KB (talk • contribs) 18:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cagayan Heritage Conservation Society re-opening for discussion

Hello! We were still in the middle of discussion but then you closed it already. I don't really mind if the majority vote is keep or delete but I believe it was prematurely closed as "keep". I don't know how to re-open the discussion or renominate it so I am confused what to do now. If you can do something to re-open the discussion, that would be great. Cheers!—Allenjambalaya (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Allenjambalaya, how was this premature? It had been relisted twice, and at the time I closed it the page hadn't been edited for 4 days. I don't see what leaving it open for another week would have accomplished. – bradv🍁 15:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for reply

Hello, Bradv. You have new messages at Can I Log In's talk page.
Message added 18:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I've replied back. I would like a reply back from you please. {{replyto}} Can I Log In's (talk) page 18:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. – bradv🍁 18:37, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Thank you for being a admin on this wiki. Also, I thank you for constantly reverting edits made in bad faith,such as vandalism. Henry20090 (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And welcome to Wikipedia. – bradv🍁 15:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for the revert Brad. The fact that you are knowingly keeping articles that are verifiably written by a WMF banned editor, provides more proof of the validity of my ban. Cheers! Feel free to indef this IP again. 138.162.0.41 (talk) 19:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 |}
 :Thanks! And welcome to Wikipedia. – [[User:Bradv|<span style="color:#333">'''brad''v'''''</span>]][[User talk:Bradv|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]] 15:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
+== Thanks for the revert ==
+Thanks for the revert Brad. The fact that you are knowingly keeping articles that are verifiably written by a WMF banned editor, provides more proof of the validity of my ban. Cheers! Feel free to indef this IP again. [[Special:Contributions/138.162.0.41|138.162.0.41]] ([[User talk:138.162.0.41|talk]]) 19:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)