Jump to content

User talk:Phuzion: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Tejaskapoor22 - "→‎sorry for the inconvenience: new section"
→‎hello phuzion: new section
Line 71: Line 71:


sorry for that <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tejaskapoor22|Tejaskapoor22]] ([[User talk:Tejaskapoor22#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tejaskapoor22|contribs]]) 17:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
sorry for that <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tejaskapoor22|Tejaskapoor22]] ([[User talk:Tejaskapoor22#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tejaskapoor22|contribs]]) 17:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== hello phuzion ==

hello thia ia mehboob working on the article of sajid ali thahim sahab we are making it tobe perfect and look well and good you are requested to remove deletion tag
thanks

Revision as of 06:45, 17 May 2020



OK, I can see now how you believe that my edit to the Crossley Heath school was not neutral. Thank you, Londoner.


you are not a nice person — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuk Da Police (talkcontribs) 14:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be bashful, I appreciate comments on my userpage!

User_talk:Phuzion/Archives_index


Hi Phuzion! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer user rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tool. Instead of having you formally request the pending changes reviewer right at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.

Keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

  • A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
  • A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
  • Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
  • You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
  • Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page, and I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already said thanks in IRC, but thanks again! I'm glad that my work fighting vandalism is being recognized. Phuzion (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Politically neutral?!

With all due respect, even you don't believe yourself when you claim content is politically neutral. I made two edits that changed the content from propaganda to neutral and factual. And you immediately sent me a message rejecting my edits because they didn't comport to your personal agenda.

If nothing else, you're a cautionary tale about the failings of government schools. My condolences on your intellectual and moral cowardice.

  ````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2890:8D80:E1BD:B7DF:51C0:B294 (talk) 01:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bedford, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedford High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Majavah/Aligner now supports using the syntax highlighter

Hi, just wanted to let you know that Aligner should now work when you are using the syntax highlighter. It might require a WP:REFRESH to pick up the changes.  Majavah (t/c) 05:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... and now it supports articles with more than one infobox! Also just let me know if you come across infoboxes that are not recognized by the template so I can fix them.  Majavah (t/c) 12:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so incredibly much! You have no idea how helpful this is! I'll definitely test the heck out of this and let you know about any issues I find with it. I appreciate your work so much! Phuzion (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nikkutendo Wants to apologize and also give thanks

Hello. I would like to apologize for using your/the picture of the BESM 4th Edition cover and claiming it as my own. That was not my intention as I just wanted to change the cover art of Big Eyes Small Mouth book to the current edition. If you are/were the creator of the cover art, you did one amazing picture.

Thank you for making the change to the Wiki article and helping to fix the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkutendo (talkcontribs) 17:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the inconvenience

sorry for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejaskapoor22 (talkcontribs) 17:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello phuzion

hello thia ia mehboob working on the article of sajid ali thahim sahab we are making it tobe perfect and look well and good you are requested to remove deletion tag thanks