User talk:Jikaoli Kol: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jikaoli Kol/Archives/2020/March. (BOT) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Maybe my comment isn't correct to you but I behave by the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina which is legitimate for area where I live.<br/>Greetings!<br/>[[User:130309p|130309p]] ([[User talk:130309p|talk]]) 14:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC) |
Maybe my comment isn't correct to you but I behave by the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina which is legitimate for area where I live.<br/>Greetings!<br/>[[User:130309p|130309p]] ([[User talk:130309p|talk]]) 14:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
== About You (company) == |
|||
Hi Jikaoli Kol, back in January, you have added an 'advert' tag to the [[About You (company)|About You]]-article. Meanwhile, the article has been edited rather extensively, mainly by [[User:Nerfdart|Nerfdart]], who removed some alleged "puffery" and "unsupported attributions". Now, the article's tone is really sober. Also, I have lately addressed a 'missing citation' hint. I don't think the article in its current state still warrants the 'advert' tag. Do you? Please let me know if you perceive any further issues with promotional tone or unsupported claims. Otherwise I would take the liberty to proceed and remove the tag. Thank you --[[User:Kvaloya|Kvaloya]] ([[User talk:Kvaloya|talk]]) 21:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:04, 3 June 2020
This is Jikaoli Kol's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
A kitten for you!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Cute_grey_kitten.jpg/150px-Cute_grey_kitten.jpg)
Hello Jikaoli Kol, This is Aradhya from india. i have go through Nimika Ratnakar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimika_Ratnakar account. She is an famous actress in Karnataka Film Industry(State In India). You have reported this account and its coming as" This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use." Clean up this account to help the community people. I hope you understand.
Regards, Aradhya B aradhyab99@gmail.com
B Aradhya (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Marco Terragni
Hi Kol, I added some articles and books as references for the page of Marco Terragni. From my point of view the citations now are enough. Each part of the article has a references. Can I remove the notice? Best regards GC Giovannicaciotta (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
1st Krajina Corps added template
Hello, I saw template you've left on 1st Krajina Corps and I don't understand how the content of the article is linked with the problem and URL (which is invalid)? On page which URL was left, there is no any connection with the article or even paragraphing to that text. That web-site I saw first time few minutes ago, so I think that it isn't quite correct to randomly link something to the author text without informing before. In that URL there is list that looks similarly but it isn't even close to the list on the article. URL contains partial list of brigades of the Army of the Republic of Srpska (mainly of the 1st Krajina Corps and East Bosnian Corps) and on article about 1st Krajina Corps there is complete list of units (brigades, divisions, regiments...) of that corps only. Content on the article has only translated parts of the equivalent article on Serbian Wikipedia with alphabetical order of all units that were part of the 1st Krajina Corps.
Maybe my comment isn't correct to you but I behave by the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina which is legitimate for area where I live.
Greetings!
130309p (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
About You (company)
Hi Jikaoli Kol, back in January, you have added an 'advert' tag to the About You-article. Meanwhile, the article has been edited rather extensively, mainly by Nerfdart, who removed some alleged "puffery" and "unsupported attributions". Now, the article's tone is really sober. Also, I have lately addressed a 'missing citation' hint. I don't think the article in its current state still warrants the 'advert' tag. Do you? Please let me know if you perceive any further issues with promotional tone or unsupported claims. Otherwise I would take the liberty to proceed and remove the tag. Thank you --Kvaloya (talk) 21:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)