Jump to content

Talk:Boulder: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SSTbot (talk | contribs)
Added {{vital article}}
Added section "Size distinction"
Line 20: Line 20:


:::'Clast size' is probably a better term, although I see that Wentworth's original 1922 paper also refers to 'fragments' or 'pieces'. However, 'grain size' is the term typically used for sediments or rocks. [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 20:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
:::'Clast size' is probably a better term, although I see that Wentworth's original 1922 paper also refers to 'fragments' or 'pieces'. However, 'grain size' is the term typically used for sediments or rocks. [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 20:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

==Size distinction==
I question the statement "In British English a rock is bigger than a boulder"
Neither the Cambridge Dictionary (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rock), the Macmillan Dictionary (https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/boulder) or the Dictionary linked in the sources (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rock) give reason to believe that.
Just the opposite, the first two dictionaries define a boulder as "a very large rock" (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/boulder & https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/boulder) which to me is the opposite of the statement in question. [[Special:Contributions/2003:C9:672B:9F59:3C4A:50D5:A78D:21E|2003:C9:672B:9F59:3C4A:50D5:A78D:21E]] ([[User talk:2003:C9:672B:9F59:3C4A:50D5:A78D:21E|talk]]) 21:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:40, 27 June 2020

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconGeology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconTalk:Boulder is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

```

Untitled

Question: does a grain mean the same thing in geology as it does in Material science? If so, a grain 10 inches in diameter seems impossibly large! I would not expect to find this naturally (Neutron Stars, etc. notwithstanding). 142.157.103.144 (talk) - 15:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Grain" is used not in the sense of grains in metals or crystal but in the sense of grains in granular materials like clay, sand, gravel, etc. mike4ty4 (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also think that "grain size" for rock and boulder is not applicable in common language. May be for scientific use it is OK, but it is just funny to read in a lexicon... I corrected it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSoos (talkcontribs) 17:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
'Clast size' is probably a better term, although I see that Wentworth's original 1922 paper also refers to 'fragments' or 'pieces'. However, 'grain size' is the term typically used for sediments or rocks. Mikenorton (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Size distinction

I question the statement "In British English a rock is bigger than a boulder" Neither the Cambridge Dictionary (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rock), the Macmillan Dictionary (https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/boulder) or the Dictionary linked in the sources (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rock) give reason to believe that. Just the opposite, the first two dictionaries define a boulder as "a very large rock" (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/boulder & https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/boulder) which to me is the opposite of the statement in question. 2003:C9:672B:9F59:3C4A:50D5:A78D:21E (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]