User talk:Ilena: Difference between revisions
3RR Warning |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==3RR Warning== |
==3RR Warning== |
||
Please note you're close to violating [[WP:3RR]] with your edits to [[Stephen Barrett]]. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] 01:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC) |
Please note you're close to violating [[WP:3RR]] with your edits to [[Stephen Barrett]]. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] 01:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
:::Wrong. Whoever is removing my links is in the wrong. Pure and utter censorship. [[User:Ilena|Ilena]] 01:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:27, 27 December 2006
 Archives |
|---|
Experiences on Wikipedia
For how I feel about defeating all three so called Quackbusters ... and their attempts to silence my voice and to change the history of this case: [1]
- For the mutt and others attempting to bully me ... Woof Woof Woof ... I don't respond to anonymous dogs.
I presume you are referring to me? Please confirm. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Ilena 14:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Admin noticeboard post
I've posted to the admin noticeboard asking for a community review of your edits and continued disruptive editing. This is a courtesy notification. MastCell 18:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I posted this on this page and it was removed here and on the NCAHF page. I am reinstating it and do not appreciate your attempts to rewrite history and archive your complaints and remove my comments. This has gone on since I exposed NCAHF for not having any apparent legal corporation.
What was removed:
- Please let me update your information. My edits were removed from the moment I came to Wikipedia exposing NCAHF's questionable corporate status. State records were called POV and removed by you and others. When I first began to read here ... Barrett Vs Rosenthal was unrecognizable to the facts of the case. Jance has done an admirable job of getting the basics of this article correct. I am very familiar with being ganged up by people defending Stephen Barrett and his questionable operations and his "feuds" (SLAPP suits that go for over 6 years and end up in The Supreme Court of California). Thank you and have a lovely holiday. Ilena 20:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
External links
Please do not revert removal of links to your own site. Per an arbitration committee ruling, links to sites which include attacks on Wikipedia editors may be removed on sight. Guy (Help!) 00:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
3RR Warning
Please note you're close to violating WP:3RR with your edits to Stephen Barrett. --Ronz 01:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wrong. Whoever is removing my links is in the wrong. Pure and utter censorship. Ilena 01:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)