User talk:Khukri

Note For any messages you leave on my talk pages I will respond here, if I have left a message on your pages, you may reply there and I will keep an eye on your page for a couple of days.

Bankruptcy in Canada

Hi Khukri,

Thank you for your message. I am a student and the change is a part of major reorganization of the topic under law school faculty supervision. The topic is to be further developed and I hope it might become a good contribution to the project. Please do not revert the changes, if you feel that the provided information is not accurate, may you please contact me?

Thank you.

Sincerely, Osghall — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osghall (talk • contribs)

No problems, I see you carried on working on it so no problems there. Just a couple of comments as it's under development, I'd remove the capitals on the headers, also it's better that the article gives the premise of bankruptcy law in canada, not the minutiae. Have a quick scan through this WP:MOS , and any further problems don't hesitate to give me a shout. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 21:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Reply

I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. TeckWiz^TalkContribs_@

UW

Make templates for redlinks? is that the idea? Anyplace in particular you want attention, or did you want to assign me a chunk? KillerChihuahua^?!? 15:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Misandry

I deleted the section on Misandry in Literature because I've proven that at least one of the quotes from the Fatherhood Coalition is taken so far out of context that it seems to say the opposite of what it originally meant. I doubt this is unintentional. The Misandry in Literature section consists of quotes from the Fatherhood Coalition, so the whole thing is suspect. It's not NPOV and it's not good research. Please note the discussion on the talk page. 06:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.118.65.208 (talk • contribs)

Slight Misunderstanding

This is from the guy who was vandalising "Ben 10's" page: I am Ben 10. I just don't bother to log on most of the time. I will do so more often now to avoid confusion. I was trying to get rid of a glitch with my User Boxes. (Ben 10) 16:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

OK no problems sorry about that, all I saw was a large deletion from a user page. If you want any help give me a shout. Cheers Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 21:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_user_warnings

Hi! Can you look into (and past the really stinko template that began the discussion complete with tfd talk) the discussion on User talk:Fabartus/Wet noodle award which is aimed more at editor reminders, vice problem edit policing. You've attracted some significant talent there, and I'd appreciate it if you'd all consider attacking unnecessary time waste into your integration edits.

Since this was somewhat off to the side of your main focus, I thought you should consider whether a link be made to your project pages. Thanks // FrankB 16:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The template itself has been TfD'd so no problems, what I am interested is, is when we look at this type of template subject in the near future that you come onboard with us a WP:UW and help out. Regards Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 19:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Help!

Could you take a look at the entry for Napa Chic. A user named User:Calton keeps wanting to delete it. I think he is just being weird about it. All very odd, but we need a rational administrator to intercede. Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marylandwizard (talk • contribs)

OK, I've had a look through the AfD, and at the time of it's application it was an OK nomination for deletion. I can't see anything in the actions of Calton to warrant any ittervention or going to the Admin noticebaord as mentioned by Aecis. The comments on your talk page from Ground Zero, are accurate, and I would have to going along with them. You have a couple of days, in which to improve the article to sufficient quality to maybe persuade the closing editor, leaving a new comment on the bottom of the AfD. But I would say your chances are slim, it's not the most notable of subjects and doesn't get many google hits. Same as Ground Zero, I know it's not what you want to hear, but in the case I would have to say "take it on the chin ol' son" and move on. If you have any further problems don't hesitate to give me a shout. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 07:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Winterval(s)!!!! (12-22-06)

Oh, the weather outside is frightful!... But I hope wherever you you are, that it's warm and delightful! : ) —Randfan!!

Dear Khukri, I wish you a very, very merry Winterval! And since I don't know which you celebrate, I hope you have/had/will have a very happy Holiday!. Hope you and your family have a magnificent day, or series of days! You might wanna install the "SaucyMillionaire" font to see this correctly. Cheers, mate!:) —Randfan!!

God (or your deity/deities) bless you and your family! —¡Randfan!^{Sign here?} 02:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

-Note:I was planning to hand these out on the 22 of Dec. Happy holidays —¡Randfan!^{Sign here?} 23:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Neturei Karta dispute/vandalism

I've added a small section (talmud interpertations) into the topic of Neturei Karta (which took a while to make due to the complexity of the talmud) and it appears that other people [a.k.a. user:Bsnowball] are "trigger happy" to remove it despite it's intelectual relevance and encyclopedic importance. to the best of my knowledge, encyclopedias are supposed to expand sub-topics on their subjects and not look for the shortest, least informative, dictionary-like descriptions.

Jaakobou 09:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

I've had a look at the subject and I don't know enough about it to interfere, so all I can say is bring your problems to the articles talk page, avoid WP:3rr and if he/she ignores your arguments (unreasonably I might add) then give me another shout. Sorry I can't be of any more help. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 09:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Kris Radlinski - VP

You reverted all my changes. Why? I was adding information, not vandalising it. I've changed it back. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.192.136.183 (talk) 20:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC).

No probs, Wikipedia can only really deal with referenced material, and I remember the radlinski move over stories and usually it only came down to unsubstantiated tabloid rumours. Unless you can reference it I wouldn't really think about adding it to his biog piece. Regards Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 21:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

IP 84.217.134.8 Vandalism

I added the blatant vandal tag because it appeared to me as if he was changing information ruthlessly in an effort to mess up the page. Sbrools 19:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism Templates for WP:UW

Since we have separated test templates and vandalism templates, I don't see why we should have a vandalism level 0. If you can't give it above a 0, it's really a test, not vandalism, as current guidelines state to start at level 2 for nonsense and such. I personally don't even think there should be a vand1, but other users do so it should stay. I think there should be no level 0 for other types of vandalism also, like blanking. TeckWiz^TalkContribs_@ 18:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:UWLS

Hi,

You are down as a member of the WikiProject on user warning layout standardisation. I and a number of editors for the last couple of months have been working on the harmonisation of the current warning message templates, at WP:UW. I have spoken to a couple of other members of your project, and I would like to merge it and it's talk pages with ours. If you still have interest in the project or would like to participate or have any thoughts on the combined projects please let me know. Any other problems don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 10:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. --Randy Johnston 18:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for dealing with AmericanBrit for me. I was afraid he would get away with making personal attacks on me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.130.138.12 (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC).

Thank you - that was a vandal.

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page - I really appreciate it. (I think it's an AOL user whose spam link I reverted. Oh well.) :-P --TheOtherBob 21:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

eh?

umm, got a message saying I vandalised a page, I didn't. Are you sure it was me?