Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ajaxf: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
*'''Attention!''' I suspect that all support votes here are made by the same person having different usernames: [[User:Sigeway|Sigeway]], [[User:KodiakB3|KodiakB3]],[[User:TriceraGuy|TriceraGuy]],[[User:Zooyak|Zooyak]],[[User:Monster1000|Monster1000]]. [[User:Olegivvit|Olegivvit]] 12:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Attention!''' I suspect that all support votes here are made by the same person having different usernames: [[User:Sigeway|Sigeway]], [[User:KodiakB3|KodiakB3]],[[User:TriceraGuy|TriceraGuy]],[[User:Zooyak|Zooyak]],[[User:Monster1000|Monster1000]]. [[User:Olegivvit|Olegivvit]] 12:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
Not me. [[User:Daniel10|Daniel10]] 12:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
Not me. And this is breaking rules. It says make comments on the picture, no the person or people. I should tell the administrators. [[User:Daniel10|Daniel10]] 12:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 12:38, 29 December 2006
AjaxF
Nomination I found this picture and it is amazing!! The two guinea pigs are so cute!! Is there anything that the picture needs to make it better? Here is the picture:
Daniel10 15:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I doubt it will pass FPC. The red-eye in the left guinea pig would have to be corrected, and the white balance is off (the picture is too red). The image has noticeable jpg compression, ans thus is not particularly sharp. There is also some colour noise on the background. Unfortunately, "cuteness" is not part of the FP criteria, and isn't valued in FP (though if a picture is good quality and cute, that's quite all right). It's a nice photo, but it's not high enough quality for FPC, sorry. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 13:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Actually the left guinea pig's eyes are red.Joshua dude 11:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Its true, guinea pig's can be white with red eyes. Daniel10 11:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support. I think that this picture has a very good quality. I think it can make Featured Picture. Sigeway 14:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, no chance at all, the left hand animal is too blurred - Adrian Pingstone 16:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support I don't think that the left had guine pig is blurred. Its a very good quality picture. KodiakB3 11:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support This is a very good quality picture. TriceraGuy 11:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support A very good quality picture such as this deserves to be featured. Since lots of people have supported it, I'll change it to featured picture. KangarooFan1 11:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment You can't change it to Featured picture if voting just started, I changed the template back to {{fpc}}. Also, the vote right above doesn't count, since there isn't a signature. | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 11:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
You just hate guinea pigs. I'm changing it!! 85.210.43.199 12:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support I love the quality of the picture. Also, how do we make a signiture? Zooyak 11:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Very Strong Support The quality is amazing!! Monster1000 12:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Vehement Oppose because of apparent ballot stuffing (puppeting?) by users Zooyak, KangarooFan1, TriceraGuy, KodiakB3, Monster1000 - all are new accounts. --Janke | Talk 12:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose and Comment: anon users are still placing the Featured Picture template on the image's page. —sd31415 (sign here) 12:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Attention! I suspect that all support votes here are made by the same person having different usernames: Sigeway, KodiakB3,TriceraGuy,Zooyak,Monster1000. Olegivvit 12:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Not me. And this is breaking rules. It says make comments on the picture, no the person or people. I should tell the administrators. Daniel10 12:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)