User talk:Justanothersgwikieditor

OHD COI

Hi there, I am not sure how to fill up the COI

Under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Paid_editors, it states "If you are being paid for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must declare who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. You may do this on your user page, on the talk page of affected articles, or in your edit summaries. As you have a conflict of interest, you must ensure everyone with whom you interact is aware of your paid status, in all discussions on Wikipedia pages within any namespace.

Can I just keep to disclosing on the 'edit' or 'request for edit' requests? Thank you. Edvarcl (talk) 10:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Is this what you meant? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oasia_Hotel_Downtown#COI — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edvarcl (talk • contribs) 10:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

@Edvarcl: Yes. That is correct and I moved it within the project banner for better reading as well. You will need to maintain your own user page with a declaration, an example will be User:Alexdltb, as well. Can be in text, table or anything.

You are not supposed to edit the article directly from now onwards due to the COI. Any edits are to be requested, you can refer to this Template:Request edit on how to request other editors to edit. Generally it requires you to create a new section, put the template {{request edit}} there and write out what you want to add/modify/remove with references and reasoning. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Edvarcl like this?

@Edvarcl: Yes. It will be good that you list OHD (or/and others) as the client(s) of your company and mentioned which pages which you have paid COI, (requested) edits. Its better to be out front on your userpage rather than looking through your contributions, a simple but good example is here, checking the talkpages of the articles for COI declaration. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: done for user page.

@Justanothersgwikieditor: I understand that I am supposed to edit the article directly from now onwards due to the COI. But what if it is an edit for readability and no factual changes? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oasia_Hotel_Downtown Edvarcl (talk) 09:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Edvarcl: Thanks for the update on your user page. Do remember to sign your comments with ~~~~ at the end of your comment so a signature will be automatically generated. Understand it is for readability and no factual changes but it will be best an edit request since it is not an obvious minor edit. It could be treated as promotional by some other editors. I can help with this edit request. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: Ah I see. Thank you! Edvarcl (talk) 10:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: Sorry to bother you, but I am trying to understand how long it takes for change requests to be approved. I put up some change requests on the 11th Aug. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oasia_Hotel_Downtown Edvarcl (talk)

@Edvarcl: It really depends on volunteers and admins (who are volunteers as well) to check the requests and either approve/reject it. So it can be very fast or very slow or somewhere in between. I can only advise patience. Understand your client might be impatient about it or contract issues but the situation is sadly unavoidable. I try to see whether I am free later to take a look at it. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: I see! Yes, I did told them to exercise patience as well. Is the queue generally ordered based on timeliness (last in, last out) or individual editor's interest? Thank you so much! Edvarcl (talk)

@Edvarcl: If you look at the talkpage, there is a link (There are currently 96 requests waiting for review.) in the word 96 requests (number might be different for you as it is a cached result), it will bring you to CAT:EDITREQ where the requests are in chronological order and generally it is being done First In First out. Yours is around 50+ 60+ in queue. Of course, in eliminating backlog, the oldest are being cleared first and whether an editor is feeling competent about assessing it. There are quite a few partial done so hopefully the older ones are cleared faster or someone is interested in yours. I am not sure I am that competent for your edit requests so we can only wait for others (yes I have other stuff that I used to wait a few months for other editors to assess but generally I forget about them and it is not as time critical as yours (in your sense)). So patience is the only thing now. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 03:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: I see. Yes I did looked at the requests totals and they fluctuated up and down every week when I checked it, but I wasn't sure how they are processed. Thank you for the clarifications! Edvarcl (talk)

Solomon Carpet

Hi. I saw that you put Notability tag on Solomon Carpet article. This company is one of the main carpet producers of Iran and the largest carpet in the world was woven by this company. What is your criteria for notability? Please help me to improve its references. Thanks  MrInfo2012  Talk  04:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

@MrInfo2012: Hi, looking at the lead paragraph, there is only 1 source which made this claim and it is at a ceremony held by Solomon Carpet. I skipped the self published sources as they cannot be used for notability purposes. While I do not doubt is it the one of the main carpet producers of Iran, more sources are needed and how it passes the usual notability guidelines. Producing the largest carpet in the world makes the carpet notable (if enough sources exist) but does not confer notability to the company. In short, better and more sources (not necessarily English) are needed. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

SFF

I am not a paid editor, I am in the Fintech industry and have been to SFF.Kwansss (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

I am not part of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, though I met a few at SFF, but I met a lot of overseas foreign dignitaries at SFF. I am not from Singapore and currently staying other part of the world.Kwansss (talk) 06:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

@Kwansss: Okay great! Thanks for all the information! --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding. I may expand in the coming days, if you think that’s promotional, please revert it.Kwansss (talk) 09:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Please create a new page

Hello my name is Ishan and I am from India, I noticed your edits on Garena. Thank you for your edits. I request you to create a new page of Garena's Parent company Sea Limited Itsrear (talk) 08:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Itsrear: Hi there~! I am still working on some other changes and finding references so creation of Sea Group can be done. Planning to work off the Draft:Sea Group and submit the draft instead. Its still a work in progress so I am not sure when I submit the draft but hopefully eventually I will click the button to submit. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 08:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: you should submit the Draft:Sea Group.
Itsrear (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Lee Hsien Loong article

Hello, I have proposed for a revamp of the page of Lee Hsien Loong, but failed to ping you despite you being one of the contributors to the debate of the article's "Controversies" section. I apologise for that omission and this is a personal notification to request your participation and feedback. Seloloving (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@Seloloving: no worries, reading up now. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Seeking a neutral opinion

Hello. I am seeking your assistance again.

In the past week, I have been increasingly reverting User talk:202.166.70.149 due to their poor English. See diffs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=East_Coast_Group_Representation_Constituency&oldid=prev&diff=974458748

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aljunied_Group_Representation_Constituency&diff=prev&oldid=975887913

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chua_Chu_Kang_Group_Representation_Constituency&diff=prev&oldid=975888999

However, it's understandable that the user may feel harassed, as they have reverted my reverts accordingly, even when it doesn't make sense. For example, on Aljunied GRC's page:

Aljunied GRC is led by Pritam Singh

was changed to

Aljunied GRC present days heads by Pritam Singh

under the reason "Rewritten the sentence as previous user (aka me) modify it and claims that is bad english structure but it does not look so." Which obviously doesn't make sense. The IP user is a useful contributor, but nevertheless has already racked up a previous block, numerous warnings, and vandalism counts (which I disagree with). I do not wish to take the user to ANI, and seek your neutral input on his talkpage, if possible. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Seloloving: Based on this edit, I see that it can be a bad case of WP:OWN. I had placed an information tag on his talkpage as well. I see that his English proficiency has been noticed and a few times as well. I believe ANI will not be needed, as long as he continues to "vandalise", report to WP:AIV accordingly and he will get increasing length of blocks. Apparently he will move on to other topics after concerns are being raised on a topic. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Update : Based on the 4 warnings given, do go ahead and report to AIV if he "vandalise" again, please remember to cite WP:OWN issues as well. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance and advice. Seloloving (talk) 04:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Seloloving: He has been blocked (3 months) for another round of persistent editing. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor - well, I tried. Thanks for the heads up. Seloloving (talk) 09:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

```

Removing edits time and time again

Hi please stop your nonsense of removing my edits. It is very irritating. Please dont pin point me that I vandalise as what u did on my talk page. Please look at what u want made is it the same as me. If it is same then dont change. No point getting u and I into an edit war. And do not threaten me by saying u will block me. I relly dont see a need to take down my info. In addition no grammar mistake also. Be this the last time I see u taking down edits if not i will now request u to be block instead of me. Thanks! If u want to delete my message to you go ahead but dont regret that u will be block. Sorry if my words is harsh but that is the frustration I have on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.166.70.149 (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@202.166.70.149: Please reply to all the comments on your talkpage. There is fairly no need for me to repeat what others had said. It has been noted time and time again on your talkpage but you did not respond to any of the messages and you chose to come to my talkpage because I reverted your disruptive editing. Persistent disruptive editing will get you banned. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)