Jump to content

User:GoogleMeNowPlease: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


===Trivia===
===Trivia===
*I accept evolution.
*I accept evolution.
*I believe Shakespeare was the greatest writer of all times
*I believe Shakespeare was the greatest writer of all times
*I am [[pro-life]] but I recognize that most people that are pro-abortion, are not evil and hold to other positions because of misunderstandings
*I am [[pro-life]] but I recognize that most people that are pro-abortion, are not evil and hold to other positions because of misunderstandings
*I would not consider myself either a conservative or a liberal. Centrist is probably the best descriptor for me
*I would not consider myself either a conservative or a liberal. Centrist is probably the best descriptor for me
*My edits regarding religious topics are NOT made to support any particular religious dogma. I usually strive to provide both sides of the argument
*My edits regarding religious topics are NOT made to support any particular religious dogma. I usually strive to provide both sides of the argument
*I love chess
*I support democracy and freedom of religion
*Mocking my religion will not make me mad.
*Supporting my religion will not necessarily make me like you
*I do not care if you are gay, promiscuous, use condoms etc. These are honestly some of the most uninteresting topics in religion/philosophy
*I believe racialism is pseudoscience. Thus, I disagree with the whole concept of a race as a coherent idea
*Liberals consider me a conservative, conservatives consider me a radical liberal.
*[[Intelligent design]] is NOT science. [[Teleological argument]] is a valid philosophical argument
* I do NOT believe that "science" is foundation of any kind of epistemology.

Revision as of 01:48, 24 September 2020

Thanks for checking out my page. Currently a student, editing Wikipedia in my free time. Do not hesitate to say hello, I love engaging people.

This user is Roman Catholic.
AThis user knows more about atheism than you but is not an atheist
✝️This user is anti anti-Catholic




Why?

For intellectuals ideas (including atheist dogmas) are toys. Your atheism is for us a provider of toys. One man's atheism is another man's laughing stock. We do not hate your atheism, there is no hate of ants necessary to crush their habitats.

But Really?

Ok, as you may have realized, the above is not meant to be serious. I do not personally believe atheism is incoherent or particularly wrong. I am not an atheist, but I do not have anything against atheists, or people of any other religion or non religion. I do not edit in favor of the Catholic Church or against the Catholic Church. I also do not want an us vs them mentality. If you think Catholicism is evil, but love Shakespeare, we probably will have a lot in common. Religion is just 1 part of who I am

Trivia

  • I accept evolution.
  • I believe Shakespeare was the greatest writer of all times
  • I am pro-life but I recognize that most people that are pro-abortion, are not evil and hold to other positions because of misunderstandings
  • I would not consider myself either a conservative or a liberal. Centrist is probably the best descriptor for me
  • My edits regarding religious topics are NOT made to support any particular religious dogma. I usually strive to provide both sides of the argument
  • I love chess
  • I support democracy and freedom of religion
  • Mocking my religion will not make me mad.
  • Supporting my religion will not necessarily make me like you
  • I do not care if you are gay, promiscuous, use condoms etc. These are honestly some of the most uninteresting topics in religion/philosophy
  • I believe racialism is pseudoscience. Thus, I disagree with the whole concept of a race as a coherent idea
  • Liberals consider me a conservative, conservatives consider me a radical liberal.
  • Intelligent design is NOT science. Teleological argument is a valid philosophical argument
  • I do NOT believe that "science" is foundation of any kind of epistemology.