Talk:IATF 16949: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Suggest Renaming: Delete empty section (this is what happens when you add a commentd to save a requested move!) |
→Requested move 7 October 2020: well the article is now a mess of IATF |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[:ISO/TS 16949]] → {{no redirect|IATF 16949}} – ISO/TS 16949 is no longer the correct title. In 2016, ISO issued a press release updating and renaming this document from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 (full title:IATF 16949:2016). See Joint Press Release issued<ref>{{cite web |title=ISO /IATF Joint Press Release |url=https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IATF-Press-release-v7-08082016_CLEAN_IATF.pdf |website=IATF Website |publisher=IATF |accessdate=2020-10-07}}</ref> by ISO/IATF. (Archive: <ref>{{cite web |title=Archive.org Mirror |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180401000000*/https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IATF-Press-release-v7-08082016_CLEAN_IATF.pdf}}</ref>) [[User:Blackplate|Blackplate]] ([[User talk:Blackplate|talk]]) 14:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC) |
[[:ISO/TS 16949]] → {{no redirect|IATF 16949}} – ISO/TS 16949 is no longer the correct title. In 2016, ISO issued a press release updating and renaming this document from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 (full title:IATF 16949:2016). See Joint Press Release issued<ref>{{cite web |title=ISO /IATF Joint Press Release |url=https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IATF-Press-release-v7-08082016_CLEAN_IATF.pdf |website=IATF Website |publisher=IATF |accessdate=2020-10-07}}</ref> by ISO/IATF. (Archive: <ref>{{cite web |title=Archive.org Mirror |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180401000000*/https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IATF-Press-release-v7-08082016_CLEAN_IATF.pdf}}</ref>) [[User:Blackplate|Blackplate]] ([[User talk:Blackplate|talk]]) 14:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak oppose'''. Most standards including the OSI's go by various indices, be it by [[DIN]] or [[ANSI]] or the [[French bicycle industry]] (whose tyre sizes are completely different to everyone else's). This is just a name change and clearly the important thing is that anyone searching will look up "16949". The article overlinks IATF and I'M going to boldly change that.... The important thing is the standard, not who nominally has jurisdiction over it. [[Special:Contributions/84.236.27.182|84.236.27.182]] ([[User talk:84.236.27.182|talk]]) 21:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:45, 7 October 2020
TS 16949 is a technical Specification. Its not a Standard or Requirement. It is an effort to make a single standard to the whole world
According to: http://www.iaob.org/showPage.php?languageID=1&title=About%20ISO/TS%2016949:2002 "The ISO/TS 16949 does not replace AVSQ, EAQF, QS-9000 or VDA6.1"
ISO TS 16949 section is most useful for any industry who is recommended to customer satisfaction first,As per TS 16949 all Quality Norms are well defined to execute & build strong reliable product in to the market
Requested move 7 October 2020
 | The request to rename this article to IATF 16949 has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
ISO/TS 16949 → IATF 16949 – ISO/TS 16949 is no longer the correct title. In 2016, ISO issued a press release updating and renaming this document from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 (full title:IATF 16949:2016). See Joint Press Release issued[1] by ISO/IATF. (Archive: [2]) Blackplate (talk) 14:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. Most standards including the OSI's go by various indices, be it by DIN or ANSI or the French bicycle industry (whose tyre sizes are completely different to everyone else's). This is just a name change and clearly the important thing is that anyone searching will look up "16949". The article overlinks IATF and I'M going to boldly change that.... The important thing is the standard, not who nominally has jurisdiction over it. 84.236.27.182 (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- ^ "ISO /IATF Joint Press Release" (PDF). IATF Website. IATF. Retrieved 2020-10-07.
- ^ "Archive.org Mirror" (PDF).