Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings of Chaos: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Kings of Chaos]]: delete |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
An unsourcable webgame article. [http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=NuC&q=%22kings+of+chaos%22+-wikipedia+game&btnG=Search&meta= Google] doesn't turn up any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I found some reviews and walkthroughs, but they were of the "submit-a-review" variety or from personal websites/blogs. Couldn't find any sources through a [http://www.google.ca/search?q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.kingsofchaos.com%2F&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:officiallink search] either. Not [[WP:V|verifiable]]. If reliable sources do turn up somehow, the article will need a massive overhaul since it is basically serving as an in-game history, which is not encylopedic. [[User:Wafulz|Wafulz]] 23:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
An unsourcable webgame article. [http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=NuC&q=%22kings+of+chaos%22+-wikipedia+game&btnG=Search&meta= Google] doesn't turn up any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I found some reviews and walkthroughs, but they were of the "submit-a-review" variety or from personal websites/blogs. Couldn't find any sources through a [http://www.google.ca/search?q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.kingsofchaos.com%2F&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:officiallink search] either. Not [[WP:V|verifiable]]. If reliable sources do turn up somehow, the article will need a massive overhaul since it is basically serving as an in-game history, which is not encylopedic. [[User:Wafulz|Wafulz]] 23:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per lack of reliable sources and established notability. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] 23:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per lack of reliable sources and established notability. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] 23:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
Eye witnesses aren't sources? The stuff here is all fairly accurate. Removing the article would make our work useless and would remove a useful article from wikipedia. I agree that it could use an overhaul, but deleting it is needless. |
|||
Revision as of 20:37, 3 January 2007
An unsourcable webgame article. Google doesn't turn up any reliable sources. I found some reviews and walkthroughs, but they were of the "submit-a-review" variety or from personal websites/blogs. Couldn't find any sources through a search either. Not verifiable. If reliable sources do turn up somehow, the article will need a massive overhaul since it is basically serving as an in-game history, which is not encylopedic. Wafulz 23:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of reliable sources and established notability. Heimstern Läufer 23:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Eye witnesses aren't sources? The stuff here is all fairly accurate. Removing the article would make our work useless and would remove a useful article from wikipedia. I agree that it could use an overhaul, but deleting it is needless.