Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sajjadimanian: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mardetanha (talk | contribs) m →Suspected sockpuppets: fix |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
There have been allegations at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Farzin]] that the above are sockpuppets without any evidence except, eventually, a link to a fa-wiki page[https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%A9%DB%8C%E2%80%8C%D9%BE%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%A7:%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA_%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B2%D8%B1%D8%B3%DB%8C_%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1/Iman_farzin/%D8%A8%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C]. As this seems to be a spill over from the fa-wiki, and as unjustly insisting people are sockpuppets is a serious matter I think it would be wise to check ourselves. Thanks [[User:John B123|John B123]] ([[User talk:John B123|talk]]) 00:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |
There have been allegations at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Farzin]] that the above are sockpuppets without any evidence except, eventually, a link to a fa-wiki page[https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%A9%DB%8C%E2%80%8C%D9%BE%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%A7:%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA_%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B2%D8%B1%D8%B3%DB%8C_%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1/Iman_farzin/%D8%A8%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C]. As this seems to be a spill over from the fa-wiki, and as unjustly insisting people are sockpuppets is a serious matter I think it would be wise to check ourselves. Thanks [[User:John B123|John B123]] ([[User talk:John B123|talk]]) 00:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
::This is duplicate request of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sajjadimanian this]. it would be great to have them in one place [[User:Mardetanha|Mardetanha]] ([[User talk:Mardetanha|talk]]) 10:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |
::This is duplicate request of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sajjadimanian this]. it would be great to have them in one place [[User:Mardetanha|Mardetanha]] ([[User talk:Mardetanha|talk]]) 10:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::Also worth noting that CU won't publicly link named accounts to IP addresses, {{u|John B123}} (although, all things being equal, I support the request for a CU on the named accounts as, whether one agrees with or otherwise the deletion of the article, the English Wikipedia's processes are clearly being weaponized by another wiki, one way or another). [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:BE04:700:ED40:DFAB:9D73:1D7|2A02:C7F:BE04:700:ED40:DFAB:9D73:1D7]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7F:BE04:700:ED40:DFAB:9D73:1D7|talk]]) 12:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
Revision as of 12:06, 4 November 2020
Iman Farzin
- Iman Farzin (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under Sajjadimanian (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iman Farzin. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iman Farzin.
04 November 2020
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Sajjadimanian (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Arteshesorkh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MHosseinafshar (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- AgentBarsam (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
There have been allegations at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Farzin that the above are sockpuppets without any evidence except, eventually, a link to a fa-wiki page[1]. As this seems to be a spill over from the fa-wiki, and as unjustly insisting people are sockpuppets is a serious matter I think it would be wise to check ourselves. Thanks John B123 (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- This is duplicate request of this. it would be great to have them in one place Mardetanha (talk) 10:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Also worth noting that CU won't publicly link named accounts to IP addresses, John B123 (although, all things being equal, I support the request for a CU on the named accounts as, whether one agrees with or otherwise the deletion of the article, the English Wikipedia's processes are clearly being weaponized by another wiki, one way or another). 2A02:C7F:BE04:700:ED40:DFAB:9D73:1D7 (talk) 12:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- This is duplicate request of this. it would be great to have them in one place Mardetanha (talk) 10:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.