Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoJo Rabbit11

JoJo Rabbit11

JoJo Rabbit11 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoJo Rabbit11/Archive.

21 December 2020

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• SagittariusAstarJ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Master was banned for disruption on NDTV after their final warning. Sock was created after their ability to edit their talk page was revoked, and went on with the same pattern of editing on NDTV. Also compare the idiosyncrasies between the two accounts on User talk:JoJo Rabbit11#Final warning and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Suspecting brand promotion. Looks pretty ducky to me. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 10:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Comment Another IP user User:45.124.142.19 was blocked recently, showing a reluctance in account creation. If not same user, definitely off-wiki coordinated activity, targeting one single page.ChunnuBhai (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

[1] and [2] confirm that the IP is JoJo Rabbit1 ChunnuBhai (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

• Comment SagittariusAstarJ claims to be "new to wikipedia with no previous experience of editing" But his/her first 11 edits were done in 29 minutes to 6 different articles adding correct Wikilinks,^[3][4] citation needed templates,^{[5][6][7][8][9][10][11]} and correcting spelling errors.^[12][13] 7 of the first 11 edits were marked as "minor edits", in all cases correctly. Except for the correcting spelling errors, this is not the behaviour of a new user. It is the behaviour of a sockpuppet trying to get their account autoconfirmed.

Out of the remaining 10 edits, 8 were on the subject of NDTV, one on another Indian media company, and one was denying previous editing experience. Again, the minor edits checkbox was always used correctly (new users find it confusing). After an initial post on Talk:NDTV#Deleted Experience. Truth First from header by SagittariusAstarJ,[14] there were a series of posts by 45.124.142.19 that were written as though by a different editor who was in agreement with SagittariusAstarJ. "45.124.142.19 is obviously an indeffed user evading their block. Blocked as such by RegentsPark."

45.124.142.19's 1st block started at 14:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC), and the SagittariusAstarJ came back into use at 07:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC).[15][16] Since the IP editor and the SagittariusAstarJ account seem to work hand in glove, and the IP editor is a block-evading sock, it seems likely that they are the same person. The report at WP:ANI#Suspecting brand promotion repeats statements made by the IP editor at Talk:NDTV#Deleted Experience. Truth First from header.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

*CommentI an a new user with fever edits to this date, and a vast prior study and research to establish the knowledge of how to edit wikipeida. I can see and suspect the comments above seems to be off-wiki coordinated activity to link my account to an unrelated person whom i probably not related. SagittariusAstarJ (talk) 04:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

---