Category:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
Appearance
Pages in category "Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 491 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)I
- Igbo v Johnson, Matthey Chemicals Ltd
- Imperial Group plc v Philip Morris Ltd
- Imperial Hydropathic Hotel Co v Hampson
- Improver Corp v Remington Consumer Product Ltd
- In Plus Group Ltd v Pyke
- Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales v A-G
- Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd
- IRC v Wimbledon Football Club Ltd
- Isle of Wight Rly Co v Tahourdin
J
- J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw
- Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
- James v Greenwich LBC
- Janvier v Sweeney
- Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd
- Jennings v Rice
- Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corporation
- John Shaw & Sons (Salford) Ltd v Shaw
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA
- Jones v Padavatton
- Jones v Post Office
- Jones v University of Manchester
K
L
- L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd
- Ladd v Marshall
- Ladele v London Borough of Islington
- Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality
- Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd
- Leaf v International Galleries
- Lee v Showmen's Guild of GB
- Leisure Employment Services Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs
- Lesney Products & Co v Nolan
- Letang v Cooper
- Lewis v Averay
- Link Lending Ltd v Bustard
- Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd v IRC
- Lloyds Bank Limited v Bundy
- Lomas v JFB Firth Rixson Inc
- London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd
- Long v Lloyd
- Luke v Stoke-on-Trent City Council
M
- M25 Three
- Macarthys Ltd v Smith
- Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust plc (No 3)
- Re Maldonado
- Malone v British Airways plc
- Manchester Airport plc v Dutton
- Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH
- Mascall v Mascall
- Mattis v Pollock
- McDonald v Coys of Kensington (Sales) Ltd
- McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd
- McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment
- Medforth v Blake
- Menashe Business Mercantile Ltd v William Hill Organization Ltd
- Merritt v Merritt
- Messr UK Ltd v Britvic Soft Drinks Ltd
- Midland Bank plc v Cooke
- Mikeover Ltd v Brady
- Miller v Jackson
- Ministry of Housing and Local Government v Sharp
- The Moorcock
- Morphitis v Bernasconi
- Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford United Football Club
- Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd
- Mothew v Bristol & West Building Society
- Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialist Ltd
- Mullin v Richards
- Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Co v Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Services Ltd
- Murad v Al-Saraj
- Murray v Leisureplay plc
- Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat
- Muschett v HM Prison Service
N
- Nash v Paragon Finance plc
- National Provincial Bank v Charnley
- National Union of Gold, Silver, and Allied Trades v Albury Brothers Ltd
- Nelson v BBC (No 2)
- Nestle v National Westminster Bank plc
- Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner
- Nettleship v Weston
- North Riding Garages v Butterwick
- North West Lancashire Health Authority v A, D and G
- Notcutt v Universal Equipment Co (London) Ltd
- Ntuli v Donald
O
P
- Palk v Mortgage Services Funding plc
- Panorama Developments (Guildford) Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd
- Parker v British Airways Board
- Parker v McKenna
- Parker v South Eastern Rly Co
- Parsons (Livestock) Ltd v Uttley Ingham & Co Ltd
- Pascoe v Turner
- Paul v Constance
- Pender v Lushington
- Pennington v Waine
- Peskin v Anderson
- Pharmaceutical Society of GB v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd
- Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd
- Phipps v Pears
- Pilcher v Rawlins
- Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd
- Port of London Authority v Payne
- Printing and Numerical Registering Co v Sampson
- Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd
- Profinance Trust SA v Gladstone
- Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman
R
- R (Datafin plc) v Panel on Take-overs and Mergers
- R (Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee
- R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee
- R (on the application of Farrakhan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R v Adams
- R v Blaue
- R v Bowden
- R v Burgess
- R v Cheshire
- R v Clarkson
- R v Clinton
- R v Collins
- R v Comptroller-General of Patents, ex parte Tomlinson
- R v Constanza
- R v Dear
- R v Incedal
- R v Jordan
- R v McCredie
- R v Nedrick
- R v O'Grady
- R v Quick
- R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex p O'Brien
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Northumbria Police Authority
- R v Steane
- R v Wallace
- R v Waterfield
- R v Whiteley
- R v Williams
- R v Fellows; R v Arnold
- R. v. North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan
- Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Five Star General Trading LLC
- R&B Customs Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd
- Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers (1986) Ltd and others
- RCO Support Services Ltd v Unison
- Re A (conjoined twins)
- Re Atlantic Computer Systems plc (No 1)
- Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 2)
- Re Barings plc (No 5)
- Re Barleycorn Enterprises Ltd
- Re Bird Precision Bellows Ltd
- Re Citro
- Re Cole
- Re Conegrade Ltd
- Re Draper's Conveyance
- Re Duke of Norfolk's Settlement Trusts
- Re Ellenborough Park
- Re Endacott
- Re Exchange Banking Co
- Re Gray's Inn Construction Co Ltd
- Re Hallett's Estate
- Re Jeavons, ex p Mackay
- Re K (decd)
- Re Londonderry's Settlement
- Re New Bullas Trading Ltd
- Re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd
- Re Osoba
- Re Panama, New Zealand, and Australian Royal Mail Co
- Re Peveril Gold Mines Ltd
- Re Rica Gold Washing Co
- Re Rose
- Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc
- Re Selectmove Ltd
- Re Sevenoaks Stationers (Retail) Ltd
- Re Smith & Fawcett Ltd
- Re Tuck's Settlement Trusts
- Re Vandervell Trustees Ltd (No 2)
- Re Wragg Ltd
- Re Yenidje Tobacco Co Ltd
- Redfearn v United Kingdom
- Redgrave v Hurd
- Repington v Roberts-Gawen
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Maxwell
- Rigby v Connol
- Robertson v British Gas Corp
- Robinson v Kilvert
- Rock (Nominees) Ltd v RCO Holdings Ltd